Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

A Systematic Review of Economic Models in Stroke Care Pathways

Contents:

Author Info

  • David M Meads

    ()
    (Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds)

  • Claire Hulme

    (Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds)

  • Anne Forster

    (Academic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford)

  • Elizabeth Teale

    (Academic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford)

  • John Young

    (Academic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford)

Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    Background: the importance of evidence-based care pathways in stroke have been highlighted by recently published national guidelines. However, little research has focused on identifying which components of the care pathway are cost-effective. Objectives: To search the published literature to identify approaches that would circumvent methodological problems and allow economic evaluations of stroke care pathways. Methods: eight literature databases were searched for studies from 1999 to Feb 2010 using standard health economic evaluation terms, stroke terms and terms relating to care pathways and care processes. Studies reporting evaluations of more than one stroke care process concurrently were considered for review. Results: Very few studies met the inclusion criteria as most evaluations focused on discrete, individual interventions. Five studies were selected for review. The most promising approach to care pathway analysis using traditional modelling was to alter parameters for individual care processes and observe the impact on care pathway output. A promising alternative approach was discrete event simulation of the whole care pathway which allows representation of timing and competition for resources. Conclusions: cost-effectiveness of individual care processes should be established to aid distribution of resources effectively along the pathway. A comparison of Markov and simulation modelling in stroke is required to determine the most appropriate approach for analysing the care pathway.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://medhealth.leeds.ac.uk/download/249/auhe_wp11_04
    File Function: First version, 2011
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds in its series Working Papers with number 1104.

    as in new window
    Length: 21 pages
    Date of creation: 2011
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:lee:wpaper:1104

    Contact details of provider:
    Phone: Charles Thackrah Building, 101 Clarendon Road, LEEDS LS9 2LJ
    Fax: +44 (0) 113 343 3470
    Email:
    Web page: http://medhealth.leeds.ac.uk/auhe
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords:

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lee:wpaper:1104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Thomas Veale).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.