This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

L'influence de la connaissance du genre du partenaire dans les relations de confiance et de réciprocité: une étude expérimentale

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Aurélie Bonein
Daniel Serra

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

Ce travail étudie l'influence de la connaissance du genre du partenaire dans les relations de confiance et de réciprocité. Il rend compte d’une expérience en laboratoire sur le jeu de l'investissement qui compare les données résultant de deux traitements : le premier, sans connaissance du genre du partenaire, et le second, qui est tel que tant les « envoyeurs » que les « répondants » connaissent le genre de la personne à laquelle ils sont appariés. Les résultats obtenus montrent une grande hétérogénéité des comportements individuels, qui va du comportement théorique d’égoïsme pur à une confiance et une réciprocité totale. La connaissance du genre du répondant par les envoyeurs n'implique pas d'envois différents, même si les hommes semblent faire plus confiance en leur partenaire que les femmes. Au niveau de la réciprocité, un phénomène de « solidarité de sexe » semble dominer : les individus ont tendance à honorer d'avantage la confiance de leur partenaire s'il est du même genre qu'eux. Le genre de l'envoyeur exerce une influence significative sur les retours lorsque celui-ci est connu des répondants. Mais la croyance usuelle selon laquelle les femmes seraient plus loyales que les hommes n'est pas confirmée par l’expérience.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.lameta.univ-montp1.fr/Fr/Productions/Documents/DR2006-02.pdf
Our checks indicate that this address may not be valid because: 404 Not Found. If this is indeed the case, please notify (Patricia Modat)
File Format: application/pdf
File Function: First version, 2006
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by LAMETA, Universtiy of Montpellier in its series Working Papers with number 06-02.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 18 pages
Date of creation: Jan 2006
Date of revision: Jan 2006
Handle: RePEc:lam:wpaper:06-02

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.lameta.univ-montp1.fr/
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Patricia Modat).

Related research
Keywords:

Other versions of this item:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
  1. Chaim Fershtman & Uri Gneezy, 2001. "Discrimination In A Segmented Society: An Experimental Approach," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, vol. 116(1), pages 351-377, February. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  2. Dufwenberg, Martin & Muren, Astri, 2006. "Gender composition in teams," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 61(1), pages 50-54, September. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  3. Matthias Sutter & Ronald Bosman & Martin Kocher & Frans van Winden, 2008. "Gender pairing and bargaining – Beware the same sex!," Working Papers 2008-27, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, University of Innsbruck. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  4. Solnick, Sara J, 2001. "Gender Differences in the Ultimatum Game," Economic Inquiry, Oxford University Press, vol. 39(2), pages 189-200, April.
  5. Rachel Croson & Nancy Buchan, 1999. "Gender and Culture: International Experimental Evidence from Trust Games," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 89(2), pages 386-391, May. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  6. Kahneman, Daniel & Knetsch, Jack L & Thaler, Richard H, 1986. "Fairness and the Assumptions of Economics," Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 59(4), pages S285-300, October. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  7. U. Gneezy & W. Güth & F. Verboven, . "Presents or Investment? An Experimental Analysis," Sonderforschungsbereich 373 1998-56, Humboldt Universitaet Berlin.
    Other versions:
  8. Eckel, Catherine C & Grossman, Philip J, 2001. "Chivalry and Solidarity in Ultimatum Games," Economic Inquiry, Oxford University Press, vol. 39(2), pages 171-88, April.
  9. Gary E. Bolton & Axel Ockenfels, 2000. "ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 90(1), pages 166-193, March. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  10. Jeffrey Carpenter & Eric Verhoogen & Stephen Burks, 2003. "The Effect of Stakes in Distribution Experiments," Middlebury College Working Paper Series 03-28, Middlebury College, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  11. Scharlemann, Jorn P. W. & Eckel, Catherine C. & Kacelnik, Alex & Wilson, Rick K., 2001. "The value of a smile: Game theory with a human face," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 22(5), pages 617-640, October. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  12. Bolton, Gary E. & Katok, Elena, 1995. "An experimental test for gender differences in beneficent behavior," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 48(3-4), pages 287-292, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  13. Martin Dufenberg & Uri Gneezy & Werner Güth & Eric Van Demme, 2001. "Direct versus Indirect Reciprocity: An Experiment," Homo Oeconomicus, Institute of SocioEconomics, vol. 18, pages 19-30.
  14. Burks, Stephen V. & Carpenter, Jeffrey P. & Verhoogen, Eric, 2003. "Playing both roles in the trust game," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 195-216, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  15. Guth, Werner & Schmittberger, Rolf & Schwarze, Bernd, 1982. "An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 367-388, December. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  16. Buchan, Nancy R. & Croson, Rachel T.A. & Solnick, Sara, 2008. "Trust and gender: An examination of behavior and beliefs in the Investment Game," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 68(3-4), pages 466-476, December. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  17. Fredrik Carlsson & Dinky Daruvala & Olof Johansson-Stenman, 2005. "Are People Inequality-Averse, or Just Risk-Averse?," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 72(3), pages 375-396, 08. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  18. Knack, Stephen & Keefer, Philip, 1997. "Does Social Capital Have an Economic Payoff? A Cross-Country Investigation," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, vol. 112(4), pages 1251-88, November.
  19. Alessandro Innocenti & Maria Grazia Pazienza, 2006. "Altruism and Gender in the Trust Game," Labsi Experimental Economics Laboratory University of Siena 005, University of Siena. [Downloadable!]
  20. Bohnet, Iris & Croson, Rachel, 2004. "Trust and trustworthiness," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 55(4), pages 443-445, December. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  21. Rabin, Matthew, 1993. "Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and Economics," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 83(5), pages 1281-1302, December. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  22. Solnick, Sara J. & Schweitzer, Maurice E., 1999. "The Influence of Physical Attractiveness and Gender on Ultimatum Game Decisions," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 79(3), pages 199-215, September. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  23. Nava Ashraf & Iris Bohnet & Nikita Piankov, 2006. "Decomposing trust and trustworthiness," Experimental Economics, Springer, vol. 9(3), pages 193-208, September. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? You can create your own reading lists on IDEAS.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-16.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.