Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Factors Contributing to Participation in Web-based Surveys among Italian University Graduates

Contents:

Author Info

  • Chiara Cimini

    ()
    (AlmaLaurea Inter-university Consortium)

  • Gasperoni

    ()
    (University of Bologna, Dept. of Communication Disciplines)

  • Claudia Girotti

    ()
    (AlmaLaurea Inter-university Consortium)

Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    An established yearly survey aimed at monitoring the employment opportunities of Italian graduates, traditionally carried out with Cati methods, has been integrated during the last few years with Cawi. Cawi has become increasingly crucial due to the high number of graduates involved in the survey, which has mandated a reduction in fieldwork duration and unit costs. Although the seven Cawi surveys used here have different substantive and methodological characteristics, preliminary analysis reveals a common trend: the utmost participation is observed during the first few days immediately following initiation of fieldwork and, to a lesser degree, the delivery of follow-up reminders. Web respondents comprise a self-selected subgroup of the target population, having better academic performance and greater computer skills. A Cox regression model estimating response probability (or response time) shows, besides the obvious effects of certain personal and survey design characteristics, that faster response times are expressed by graduates in science or engineering and reporting good computer skills, whereas the fields of medicine/health and defence/security and no computer skills give rise to lower response probability. Ways to use these findings for fine-tuning data collection are discussed.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://www2.almalaurea.it/universita/pubblicazioni/wp/pdf/wp35.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2011
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by AlmaLaurea Inter-University Consortium in its series Working Papers with number 35.

    as in new window
    Length: 16
    Date of creation: Sep 2011
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:laa:wpaper:35

    Contact details of provider:
    Web page: http://www.almalaurea.it

    Related research

    Keywords: Cawi surveys; Response rate; University graduates; Cox regression;

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:laa:wpaper:35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ().

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.