Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Time Preference and Income Convergence in a Dynamic Heckscher-Ohlin Model

Contents:

Author Info

  • Taketo Kawagishi

    ()
    (Tezukayama University)

  • Kazuo Mino

    ()
    (Kyoto University)

Abstract

This paper shows that income convergence in an open-economy setting hinges upon how the time-discount rate of the households is determined. As opposed to the case of constant time-discount rate where cross-country income divergence may emerge, the small-open economy may catch up with the rest of the world if the discount rate increases with consumption. In contrast, either if the discount rate decreases with consumption or if future-oriented investment of the household lowers the time- discount rate, then the small-open economy fails to catch up with the rest of the world under free trade of commodities.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://www.kier.kyoto-u.ac.jp/DP/DP880.pdf
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by Kyoto University, Institute of Economic Research in its series KIER Working Papers with number 880.

as in new window
Length: 24pages
Date of creation: Nov 2013
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:kyo:wpaper:880

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Yoshida-Honmachi, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501
Phone: +81-75-753-7102
Fax: +81-75-753-7193
Email:
Web page: http://www.kier.kyoto-u.ac.jp/eng/index.html
More information through EDIRC

Related research

Keywords:

Find related papers by JEL classification:

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
as in new window
  1. Claustre Bajona & Timothy J. Kehoe, 2008. "Trade, growth, and convergence in a dynamic Heckscher-Ohlin model," Staff Report, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis 378, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.
  2. Obstfeld, Maurice, 1990. "Intertemporal dependence, impatience, and dynamics," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 45-75, August.
  3. Daron Acemoglu & Jaume Ventura, 2001. "The World Income Distribution," NBER Working Papers 8083, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  4. Gaitan, Beatriz & Roe, Terry L., 2007. "Path Interdependence Among Early and Late Bloomers in a Dynamic Heckscher-Ohlin Model," Bulletins, University of Minnesota, Economic Development Center 7183, University of Minnesota, Economic Development Center.
  5. Nishimura, Kazuo & Shimomura, Koji, 2002. "Indeterminacy in a dynamic small open economy," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 271-281, December.
  6. Yasuhiro Nakamoto, 2009. "Consumption externalities with endogenous time preference," Journal of Economics, Springer, Springer, vol. 96(1), pages 41-62, January.
  7. Ken-Ichi Hirose & Shinsuke Ikeda, 2008. "On Decreasing Marginal Impatience," The Japanese Economic Review, Japanese Economic Association, Japanese Economic Association, vol. 59(3), pages 259-274.
  8. Ken-ichi Hirose & Shinsuke Ikeda, 2012. "Decreasing marginal impatience in a two-country world economy," Journal of Economics, Springer, Springer, vol. 105(3), pages 247-262, April.
  9. Kiminori Matsuyama, 2009. "Structural Change in an Interdependent World: A Global View of Manufacturing Decline," Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press, MIT Press, vol. 7(2-3), pages 478-486, 04-05.
  10. Ventura, Jaume, 1997. "Growth and Interdependence," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, MIT Press, vol. 112(1), pages 57-84, February.
  11. Michael Stern, 2006. "Endogenous time preference and optimal growth," Economic Theory, Springer, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 49-70, September.
  12. Epstein, Larry G., 1987. "A simple dynamic general equilibrium model," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 68-95, February.
  13. Kawagishi, Taketo, 2012. "Endogenous time preference, investment externalities, and equilibrium indeterminacy," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 64(3), pages 234-241.
  14. Lorenzo Caliendo, 2010. "On the Dynamics of the Hecksher-Ohlin Theory," Working Papers, Becker Friedman Institute for Research In Economics 2010-011, Becker Friedman Institute for Research In Economics.
  15. Fwu-Ranq Chang, 2004. "Optimal Growth and Impatience: A Phase Diagram Analysis," CESifo Working Paper Series 1359, CESifo Group Munich.
  16. Yunfang Hu & Kazuo Mino, 2013. "Trade Structure and Belief-Driven Fluctuations in a Global Economy," KIER Working Papers, Kyoto University, Institute of Economic Research 841, Kyoto University, Institute of Economic Research.
  17. Been-Lon Chen & Kazuo Nishimura & Koji Shimomura, 2008. "Time preference and two-country trade," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 4(1), pages 29-52.
  18. Hirose, Ken-Ichi & Ikeda, Shinsuke, 2012. "Decreasing and increasing marginal impatience and the terms of trade in an interdependent world economy," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 1551-1565.
  19. Alejandro Cuñat & Marco Maffezzoli, . "Growth and Interdependence under Complete Specialization," Working Papers 183, IGIER (Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research), Bocconi University.
  20. Das, Mausumi, 2003. "Optimal growth with decreasing marginal impatience," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 27(10), pages 1881-1898, August.
  21. Becker, Gary S & Mulligan, Casey B, 1997. "The Endogenous Determination of Time Preference," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, MIT Press, vol. 112(3), pages 729-58, August.
  22. Zhiqi Chen, 1992. "Long-Run Equilibria in a Dynamic Heckscher-Ohlin Model," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 25(4), pages 923-43, November.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as in new window

Cited by:
  1. Yunfang Hu & Kazuo Mino, 2014. "Capital Accumulation and Structural Change in a Small-Open Economy," KIER Working Papers, Kyoto University, Institute of Economic Research 900, Kyoto University, Institute of Economic Research.

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kyo:wpaper:880. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Ryo Okui).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.