This paper examines how to harvest a biomass confronted with the threat of partial extinction. We show that the uncertainty involved gives rise to two opposing effects determining an optimal steady-state stock of the biomass. A "discount effect", leading to a smaller stock as compared to the certainty case, and a "cushion effect" leading to a larger stock. The net effect is indeterminate and depends on the size of the failure rate and the size of the possible collapse. Furthermore, it is shown that for some combinations of the failure rate and the size of the collapse, a strategy risking total extinction may be optimal even though the biomass could have been saved with certainty. Likewise, for other combinations, a strategy of no harvest may be followed until a mishap has taken place. Finally, both repetitive collapses and stock dependent collapses are shown to lead to a smaller optimal steady state stock as compared to a one shot stock independent collapse.
Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics in its series Discussion Papers with number
95-11.
Length: 18 pages Date of creation: Jun 1995 Date of revision: Handle: RePEc:kud:kuiedp:9511
Contact details of provider: Postal: Øster Farimagsgade 5, Building 26, DK-1353 Copenhagen K., Denmark Phone: (+45) 35 32 26 26 Fax: +45 35 32 30 00 Web page: http://www.econ.ku.dk More information through EDIRC
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Henriette Aabo Hansen).
Related research
Keywords:
Find related papers by JEL classification: Q20 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - General Q22 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Fishery