The strategic commitment moves that game theory predicts players make may sometimes seem counter-intuitive. We therefore conducted an experiment to see if people make the predicted strategic move. The experiment uses a simple bargaining situation. A player can make a strategic move of committing to not seeing what another player will demand. Our data show that subjects do, but only after substantial time, learn to make the predicted strategic move. We find only weak evidence of physical timing effects.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics in its series Discussion Papers with number
09-06.
Length: 18 pages Date of creation: Feb 2009 Date of revision: Handle: RePEc:kud:kuiedp:0906
Contact details of provider: Postal: Øster Farimagsgade 5, Building 26, DK-1353 Copenhagen K., Denmark Phone: (+45) 35 32 26 26 Fax: +45 35 32 30 00 Web page: http://www.econ.ku.dk More information through EDIRC
Order Information: Email:
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Henriette Aabo Hansen).
Find related papers by JEL classification: C72 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Noncooperative Games C78 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Bargaining Theory; Matching Theory C90 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - General C92 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Laboratory, Group Behavior D63 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement D80 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - General
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Fershtman, Chaim & Kalai, Ehud, 1997.
"Unobserved Delegation,"
International Economic Review,
Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 38(4), pages 763-74, November.
Other versions:
Fershtman, C. & Kalai, E., 1993.
"Unobserved Delegation,"
Papers
10-93, Tel Aviv - the Sackler Institute of Economic Studies.
Chaim Fershtman & Ehud Kalai, 1993.
"Unobserved Delegation,"
Discussion Papers
1043, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
[Downloadable!]