Aggregate monotonicity of cooperative solutions is widely accepted as a desirable property, and examples where certain solution concepts (such as the nucleolus) violate this property are scarce and have no economic interpretation. We provide an example of a simple four-player game that points out at a class of economic contexts where aggregate monotonicity is not appealing.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Kyiv School of Economics in its series Discussion Papers with number
13.
Length: Date of creation: Jan 2009 Date of revision:
Oct 2009 Handle: RePEc:kse:dpaper:13
Note: Forthcoming in International Journal of Game Theory Contact details of provider: Postal: 13 Yakira Str, 04119 Kyiv Phone: (38-044)492-8012 Fax: (38-044)492-8011 Email: Web page: http://www.kse.org.ua/ More information through EDIRC
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Andriy Zapechelnyuk).
Find related papers by JEL classification: C71 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Cooperative Games C78 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Bargaining Theory; Matching Theory
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.: