This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Besteuerung des Nichts — Steuerarbitrage und das schwindende Aufkommen bei Kapitaleinkommensteuern

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Dirk Schindler () (Department of Economics, University of Konstanz)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

In einem Ein-Perioden-Modell werden die Auswirkungen des deutschen Steuerrechts zur Kapitalbesteuerung auf das Kapitalmarktgleichgewicht untersucht. Dabei modellieren wir sowohl einen Unternehmenssektor, der der Körperschaftsteuer unterliegt, als auch Privatinvestoren, die einkommensteuerpflichtig sind. Es zeigt sich, daß weder lokale Steuerarbitrage noch Steuerclientele auftreten. Erweitert man das Modell um Aktien und Finanzderivate verschwindet die Steuerbasis für Kapitalertragsteuern im Rahmen der Einkommensteuer, sodaß das Steueraufkommen hieraus auf Null fällt.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://cofe.uni-konstanz.de/Papers/dp02_16.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Center of Finance and Econometrics, University of Konstanz in its series CoFE Discussion Paper with number 02-16.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 25 pages
Date of creation: 22 Aug 2002
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:knz:cofedp:0216

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Fach D 147, D-78457 Konstanz
Phone: +49-7531-88-2204
Fax: +49-7531-88-4450
Web page: http://cofe.uni-konstanz.de
More information through EDIRC

Order Information:
Email:
Web: http://cofe.uni-konstanz.de

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Ingmar Nolte).

Related research
Keywords: Steuerarbitrage; asymmetrische Besteuerung; Kapitalmarktgleichgewicht;

Find related papers by JEL classification:
G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing
H24 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Personal Income and Other Nonbusiness Taxes and Subsidies

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

  1. Dammon, Robert M & Green, Richard C, 1987. " Tax Arbitrage and the Existence of Equilibrium Prices for Financial Assets," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 42(5), pages 1143-66, December. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  2. Ross, Stephen A, 1987. "Arbitrage and Martingales with Taxation," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 95(2), pages 371-93, April. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  3. Julian Alworth, 1998. "Taxation and Integrated Financial Markets: The Challenges of Derivatives and Other Financial Innovations," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer, vol. 5(4), pages 507-534, October. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  4. Miller, Merton H, 1977. "Debt and Taxes," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 32(2), pages 261-75, May. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? IDEAS uses the data collected within the RePEc project, the largest online bibliographic database in Economics.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-26.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.