1. Horowitz, Joel & Manski, Charles, 1997. "Nonparametric Analysis of Randomized Experiments With Missing Covariate and Outcome Data," Working Papers 97-16, University of Iowa, Department of Economics.
2. Christopher J. O'Leary & Paul Decker & Stephen A. Wandner, 1997. "Reemployment Bonuses and Profiling," Staff Working Papers 98-51, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
3. Heckman, James & Singer, Burton, 1984. "A Method for Minimizing the Impact of Distributional Assumptions in Econometric Models for Duration Data," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 52(2), pages 271-320, March. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
4. Tue Gorgens & Joel L. Horowitz, 1996. "Semiparametric Estimation of a Censored Regression Model with an Unknown Transformation of the Dependent Variable," Econometrics 9603001, EconWPA. [Downloadable!]
   Other versions:
   • Horowitz, J. & Gorgens, T., 1995. "Semiparametric Estimation of a Censored Regression Model with an Unknown Transformation of the Dependent Variable," Working Papers 95-15, University of Iowa, Department of Economics.
   • Gorgens, Tue & Horowitz, Joel L., 1999. "Semiparametric estimation of a censored regression model with an unknown transformation of the dependent variable," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 155-191, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
5. Woodbury, Stephen A & Spiegelman, Robert G, 1987. "Bonuses to Workers and Employers to Reduce Unemployment: Randomized Trials in Illinois," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 77(4), pages 513-30, September. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
6. Lancaster, Tony, 1979. "Econometric Methods for the Duration of Unemployment," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 47(4), pages 939-56, July. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
7. repec:fth:prinin:242 is not listed on IDEAS
8. Bruce Meyer, 1988. "Implications of the Illinois Reemployment Bonus Experiments for Theories of Unemployment and Policy Design," Working Papers 622, Princeton University, Department of Economics, Industrial Relations Section.. [Downloadable!]
   Other versions:
   • Bruce D. Meyer, 1988. "Implications of the Illinois Reemployment Bonus Experiments For Theories of Unemployment and Policy Design," NBER Working Papers 2783, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
9. Heckman, James J, 1979. "Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 47(1), pages 153-61, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
10. Baker, Michael & Melino, Angelo, 2000. "Duration dependence and nonparametric heterogeneity: A Monte Carlo study," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 96(2), pages 357-393, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
    • Michael Baker & Angelo Melino, 1999. "Duration Dependence and Nonparametric Heterogeneity: A Monte Carlo Study," Working Papers melino-99-01, University of Toronto, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
11. Horowitz, Joel L, 1996. "Semiparametric Estimation of a Regression Model with an Unknown Transformation of the Dependent Variable," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 64(1), pages 103-37, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
12. Meyer, Bruce D, 1996. "What Have We Learned from the Illinois Reemployment Bonus Experiment?," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 14(1), pages 26-51, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
13. Moffitt, Robert, 1983. "An Economic Model of Welfare Stigma," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 73(5), pages 1023-35, December. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
14. Ham, John C & LaLonde, Robert J, 1996. "The Effect of Sample Selection and Initial Conditions in Duration Models: Evidence from Experimental Data on Training," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 64(1), pages 175-205, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)

1. Ours, J.C. van & Ridder, G., 1999. "Fast track or failure : a study of the completion rates of graduate students in economics," Discussion Paper 118, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research. [Downloadable!]
   Other versions:
   • van Ours, Jan C. & Ridder, Geert, 2000. "Fast Track or Failure: A Study of the Completion Rates of Graduate Students in Economics," IZA Discussion Papers 107, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA). [Downloadable!]
   • Ridder, G & van Ours, Jan C, 2000. "Fast Track or Failure: A Study of the Completion Rates of Graduate Students in Economics," CEPR Discussion Papers 2363, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
2. Jaap Abbring & Gerard van den Berg, 2005. "Social experiments and instrumental variables with duration outcomes," IFS Working Papers W05/19, Institute for Fiscal Studies. [Downloadable!]
   Other versions:
   • Abbring, Jaap H & van den Berg, Gerard J, 2005. "Social experiments and intrumental variables with duration outcomes," Working Paper Series 2005:11, IFAU - Institute for Labour Market Policy Evaluation. [Downloadable!]
   • Jaap H. Abbring & Gerard J. van den Berg, 2005. "Social Experiments and Instrumental Variables with Duration Outcomes," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 05-047/3, Tinbergen Institute. [Downloadable!]
3. Arntz, Melanie & Thomsen, Stephan L., 2008. "Crowding out Informal Care? Evidence from a Social Experiment in Germany," ZEW Discussion Papers 08-113, ZEW - Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung / Center for European Economic Research. [Downloadable!]
4. Marco Casari & John C. Ham & John H. Kagel, 2005. "Selection bias, demographic effects, and ability effects in common value auction experiments," Staff Reports 213, Federal Reserve Bank of New York. [Downloadable!]
   Other versions:
   • Marco Casari & John C. Ham & John H. Kagel, 2007. "Selection Bias, Demographic Effects, and Ability Effects in Common Value Auction Experiments," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 97(4), pages 1278-1304, September. [Downloadable!]
5. G.E. Bijwaard, 2002. "Instrumental Variable Estimation for Duration Data: A Reappraisal of the Illinois Reemployment Bonus Experiment," Econometrics 0204001, EconWPA. [Downloadable!]
6. G.E. Bijwaard, 2002. "Instrumental variable estimation for duration data," Econometric Institute Report 291, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Econometric Institute. [Downloadable!]
   Other versions:
   • Bijwaard, G.E., 2007. "Instrumental variable estimation for duration data," Econometric Institute Report EI 2007-14 Revision_Date:, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Econometric Institute. [Downloadable!]
   • Govert E. Bijwaard, 2008. "Instrumental Variable Estimation for Duration Data," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 08-032/4, Tinbergen Institute. [Downloadable!]
   • Bijwaard, G.E., 2002. "Instrumental variable estimation for duration data," Econometric Institute Report EI 2002-39 Revision_Date:, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Econometric Institute. [Downloadable!]
7. Govert E. Bijwaard & Justus Veenman, 2007. "Unequal Chances on the Transitional Labor Market: The Case of the Netherlands," IZA Discussion Papers 2908, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA). [Downloadable!]
   Other versions:
   • Bijwaard, G.E. & Veenman, J., 2007. "Unequal changes on the transitional labour market, the case of the Netherlands," Econometric Institute Report EI 2007-27 Revision_Date:, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Econometric Institute. [Downloadable!]
8. Govert E. Bijwaard & Justus Veenman, 2008. "Unequal Chances on a Flexible Labor Market, The Case of the Netherlands," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 08-005/4, Tinbergen Institute. [Downloadable!]