Empirical Evaluation of Preference Elicitation Techniques from Marketing and Decision Analysis
AbstractWithin empirical preference measurement, conjoint analysis (CA) and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) are common methods with CA dominating marketing research and practice and AHP becoming more and more relevant as a tool of decision analysis. Both methods mainly differ with respect to their basic conception: AHP is a compositional method whereas CA is designed in a decompositional manner. Our study aims at comparing the methods as instruments of preference measurement on a fair basis therefore being designed as similar as possible. As decision problem we use the question which university to prefer or how to design preferable universities, respectively. The results of our empirical study show a high degree of predictive validity of both methods with slight advantages for AHP. Furthermore, they seem to have a high convergent validity. However, inspecting the results in detail reveals considerable discrepancies between them, in particular with respect to the computed part-worths and attribute weights. Due to not knowing the real preferences exactly we cannot undoubtedly state which method takes the better model of the preferences of the respondents but AHP seems to perform a little better and may be a reasonable alternative to CA especially in case of more complex marketing studies.
Download InfoTo our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät in its series Jenaer Schriften zur Wirtschaftswissenschaft with number 02/2003.
Date of creation: Jan 2003
Date of revision:
Postal: If a paper is not downloadable, please contact the author(s) or the library of University of Jena, not the archive maintainer.
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Scholl, Armin & Manthey, Laura & Helm, Roland & Steiner, Michael, 2005. "Solving multiattribute design problems with analytic hierarchy process and conjoint analysis: An empirical comparison," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 164(3), pages 760-777, August.
- Uwe Cantner & Holger Graf, 2004.
"The Network of Innovators in Jena: An Application of Social Network Analysis,"
Jenaer Schriften zur Wirtschaftswissenschaft
04/2004, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät.
- Cantner, Uwe & Graf, Holger, 2006. "The network of innovators in Jena: An application of social network analysis," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 463-480, May.
- Roland Helm & Michael Steiner & Armin Scholl & Laura Manthey, 2004. "A Comparative Empirical Study on Common Methods for Measuring Preferences," Jenaer Schriften zur Wirtschaftswissenschaft 20/2004, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ().
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.