Experimental studies have consistently shown that cooperative outcomes can emerge even in finitely repeated games. Such outcomes are justified by existing reputation building models, which suggest that cooperative outcomes can be sustained if some subjects have other-regarding preferences. While the existence of other-regarding preferences is typically used to justify experimental outcomes, we are unaware of empirical studies that explicitly examine the interaction between cooperators (those with other-regarding preferences) and selfish subjects in sustaining cooperation. In this paper, we classify subjects as either selfish or cooperative using simple social preference games and then test for behavioral differences between the two types in a finitely-repeated labor market with unenforceable worker effort. Theory predicts, and our data confirms, that (1) selfish players mimic the actions of cooperators when trading partners can track the individual reputation of past partners and (2) selfish and cooperative types act differently when individual reputations cannot be tracked.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) in its series IZA Discussion Papers with number
4084.
Find related papers by JEL classification: C91 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Laboratory, Individual Behavior D31 - Microeconomics - - Distribution - - - Personal Income and Wealth Distribution D86 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Economics of Contract Law K12 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Contract Law
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Ernst Fehr & Alexander Klein & Klaus M Schmidt, 2007.
"Fairness and Contract Design,"
Econometrica,
Econometric Society, vol. 75(1), pages 121-154, 01.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions:
Ernst Fehr & Alexander Klein & Klaus M. Schmidt, 2005.
"Fairness and Contract Design,"
Discussion Papers
67, SFB/TR 15 Governance and the Efficiency of Economic Systems, Free University of Berlin, Humboldt University of Berlin, University of Bonn, University of Mannheim, University of Munich.
[Downloadable!]
Brandts, Jordi & Riedl, Arno & van Winden, Frans A.A.M., 2006.
"Competition and Well-Being,"
CEPR Discussion Papers
5532, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions:
Jordi Brandts & Arno Riedl & Frans van Winden, 2004.
"Competition and Well-Being,"
UFAE and IAE Working Papers
608.04, Unitat de Fonaments de l'Anàlisi Econòmica (UAB) and Institut d'Anàlisi Econòmica (CSIC).
[Downloadable!]
Brandts,Jordi & Riedl,Arno & Winden,Frans,van, 2005.
"Competition and Well-Being,"
Research Memoranda
033, Maastricht : METEOR, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization.
[Downloadable!]