IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/isu/genres/11353.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Comparison of Estimated Costs and Benefits of Site-Specific Versus Uniform Management for the Bean Leaf Beetle in Soybean

Author

Listed:
  • Krell, Rayda
  • Pedigo, Larry
  • Babcock, Bruce A.

Abstract

Six soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merrill, fields were examined to compare estimated costs and benefits for uniform and site-specific management (SSM) programs for the bean leaf beetle, Cerotoma trifurcata (Forster). Beetle counts and soybean yield were field-collected, insecticide and sampling costs were estimated. In five fields, site-specific management produced only slightly greater return. The inclusion of sampling costs in each scenario resulted in higher return for the uniform scenario. The uniform management scenario estimated pest pressure as well as the site-specific scenario when beetle populations were high or low. In one field with moderate pest pressure, the SSM scenario would have increased insecticide use. The estimations in this study are based on hypothetical scenarios and the application equipment to target insecticides based on map coordinates is not readily available. The economic estimations provide examples of current limitations of site-specific management that need to be addressed before this technology becomes valuable for soybean insect management.

Suggested Citation

  • Krell, Rayda & Pedigo, Larry & Babcock, Bruce A., 2003. "Comparison of Estimated Costs and Benefits of Site-Specific Versus Uniform Management for the Bean Leaf Beetle in Soybean," Staff General Research Papers Archive 11353, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:isu:genres:11353
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chin-Ling Lee & Robert Strong & Kim E. Dooley, 2021. "Analyzing Precision Agriculture Adoption across the Globe: A Systematic Review of Scholarship from 1999–2020," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-15, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:isu:genres:11353. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Curtis Balmer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deiasus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.