IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/isd/wpaper/59.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Porównawcza analiza sfery ubóstwa w krajach UE w ujêciu regionalnym

Author

Listed:
  • Tomasz Panek

    (Institute of Statistics and Demography, Warsaw School of Economics)

  • Jan Zwierzchowski

    (Institute of Statistics and Demography, Warsaw School of Economics)

Abstract

Jednym z podstawowych celów polityki spo³ecznej Unii Europejskiej i krajów cz³onkowskich jest walka z ubóstwem i wykluczeniem spo³ecznym. W ramach Strategii Lizboñskiej UE za³o¿y³a „wyjœcie” z ubóstwa 20 milionów osób w krajach cz³onkowskich do 2020 r. W opracowaniu przedstawiono propozycje modyfikacji aktualnie rekomendowanego przez UE podejœcia do pomiaru ubóstwa, które nie zapewnia porównywalnoœci wskaŸników ubóstwa pomiêdzy krajami cz³onkowskimi. Zaproponowano rozwi¹zania umo¿liwiaj¹ce porównania ocen ubóstwa miêdzy krajami cz³onkowskimi UE i ich regionami oraz nowy sposób analizy ubóstwa w oparciu o wskaŸniki stopnia zagro¿enia ubóstwem. W przeprowadzonych analizach porównawczych zwrócono uwagê na wp³yw zmian za³o¿eñ pomiaru na uzyskiwane wyniki. Do oceny ró¿nych aspektów ubóstwa zaproponowano wykorzystanie zarówno podejœcia jednowymiarowego, bazuj¹cego wy³¹cznie na wskaŸnikach monetarnych, jak i podejœcia wielowymiarowego, uwzglêdniaj¹cego tak¿e czynniki pozamonetarne (deprywacjê materialn¹ gospodarstw domowych). Istotne wydaje siê równie¿ dokonanie oceny wspó³wystêpowania ubóstwa monetarnego i niemonetarnego, których kumulacja pog³êbia dolegliwoœæ ubóstwa. Ponadto przedstawiono metody oceny stopnia zagro¿enia ubóstwem oparte o teorie zbiorów rozmytych. W empirycznej czêœci opracowania wykorzystano dane pochodz¹ce z badania EU-SILC 2010. Zasadniczym celem poznawczym prezentowanego badania by³ pomiar i porównanie miêdzyregionalne zasiêgu, natê¿enia, intensywnoœci i dotkliwoœci ubóstwa oraz ocena stopnia zagro¿enia tymi aspektami ubóstwa w krajach i regionach UE w 2010 r. Podejœcie to umo¿liwia nie tylko analizê porównawcz¹ ró¿nych aspektów ubóstwa w krajach UE, ale równie¿ wskazanie tych krajów UE i ich regionów do których powinno zostaæ skierowane finansowe wsparcie aby osi¹gn¹æ przyjêty w strategii Europa 2020 cel zmniejszenia liczby jej ubogich mieszkañców o 20 mln. Zosta³y oszacowane finansowe koszty osi¹gniêcia tego celu.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomasz Panek & Jan Zwierzchowski, 2013. "Porównawcza analiza sfery ubóstwa w krajach UE w ujêciu regionalnym," Working Papers 59, Institute of Statistics and Demography, Warsaw School of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:isd:wpaper:59
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://kolegia.sgh.waw.pl/pl/KAE/struktura/ISiD/publikacje/Documents/Working_Paper/ISID_WP_35_2013.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lewbel, Arthur, 1991. "Cost of characteristics indices and household equivalence scales," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 1277-1293, August.
    2. Achille Lemmi & Gianni Betti (ed.), 2006. "Fuzzy Set Approach to Multidimensional Poverty Measurement," Economic Studies in Inequality, Social Exclusion, and Well-Being, Springer, number 978-0-387-34251-1, Fall.
    3. FUSCO Alessio & GUIO Anne-Catherine & MARLIER Eric, 2011. "Income poverty and material deprivation in European countries," LISER Working Paper Series 2011-04, Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER).
    4. Sreenivasan Subramanian, 2004. "Indicators of Inequality and Poverty," WIDER Working Paper Series RP2004-25, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    5. Deaton,Angus & Muellbauer,John, 1980. "Economics and Consumer Behavior," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521296762.
    6. Donaldson, D. & Pendakur, K., 1999. "Equivalent-Income Functions and Income-Dependent Equivalence Scales," Discussion Papers dp99-8, Department of Economics, Simon Fraser University.
    7. Christiaensen, Luc & Scott, Christopher & Wodon, Quentin, 2002. "Poverty Measurement and Analysis," MPRA Paper 45362, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. van Praag, Bernard M S & Hagenaars, Aldi J M & van Weeren, Hans, 1982. "Poverty in Europe," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 28(3), pages 345-359, September.
    9. Tomasz Panek, 2006. "Multidimensional Fuzzy Relative Poverty Dynamic Measures in Poland," Economic Studies in Inequality, Social Exclusion, and Well-Being, in: Achille Lemmi & Gianni Betti (ed.), Fuzzy Set Approach to Multidimensional Poverty Measurement, chapter 12, pages 233-255, Springer.
    10. Jonathan Haughton & Shahidur R. Khandker, 2009. "Handbook on Poverty and Inequality," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 11985, December.
    11. Theo Goedhart & Victor Halberstadt & Arie Kapteyn & Bernard van Praag, 1977. "The Poverty Line: Concept and Measurement," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 12(4), pages 503-520.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bernard M. S. van Praag & Nico L. van der Sar, 1988. "Household Cost Functions and Equivalence Scales," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 23(2), pages 193-210.
    2. van Praag, B. M. S., 1984. "Household Cost Functions And Equivalence Scales An Alternative Approach," Econometric Institute Archives 272287, Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    3. Paul Shaffer, 2018. "Causal pluralism and mixed methods in the analysis of poverty dynamics," WIDER Working Paper Series 115, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    4. Paul Shaffer, 2018. "Causal pluralism and mixed methods in the analysis of poverty dynamics," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2018-115, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    5. Zelinsky, Tomas, 2014. "Chudoba a deprivácia na Slovensku: Metodologické aspekty a empíria [Poverty and Deprivation in Slovakia: Methodological Aspects and Empirics]," MPRA Paper 76868, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Elisabetta Santarelli, "undated". "A review of the literature on subjective poverty in Europe: a focus on data sources," Working Papers 118/13, Sapienza University of Rome, Metodi e Modelli per l'Economia, il Territorio e la Finanza MEMOTEF.
    7. Sebnem Eroğlu, 2007. "Developing an Index of Deprivation Which Integrates Objective and Subjective Dimensions: Extending the Work of Townsend, Mack and Lansley, and Halleröd," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 80(3), pages 493-510, February.
    8. Tomáš Želinský & Martina Mysíková & Thesia I. Garner, 2022. "Trends in Subjective Income Poverty Rates in the European Union," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 34(5), pages 2493-2516, October.
    9. Ferrer-i-Carbonell, Ada & van Praag, Bernard M. S., 2001. "Poverty in the Russian Federation," IZA Discussion Papers 259, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    10. Oznur Ozdamar & Eleftherios Giovanis, 2019. "Youth Multidimensional Poverty and Its Dynamics: Evidence From Selected Countries In The Mena Region," Working Papers 1339, Economic Research Forum, revised 21 Aug 2019.
    11. Anaïs Falk & Catherine Macombe & Denis Loeillet & Jean-Marc Deboin, 2022. "How Can a Company Assess Social Needs to Reduce Poverty among Its Workers? The Case of the Export Banana Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-21, August.
    12. Stanislaw Maciej Kot, 2023. "Equivalence scales for continuous distributions of expenditure," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 18(1), pages 185-218, March.
    13. Fahami Muhammad Anis & Salina H. Kassim, 2016. "Effectiveness Of Zakat-Based Programs On Poverty Alleviation And Economic Empowerment Of Poor Women: A Case Study Of Bangladesh," Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance, Bank Indonesia, vol. 1(2), pages 229-258, February.
    14. Arie Kapteyn & Peter Kooreman & Rob Willemse, 1988. "Some Methodological Issues in the Implementation of Subjective Poverty Definitions," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 23(2), pages 222-242.
    15. Sofia N. Andreou & Panos Pashardes & Nicoletta Pashourtidou, 2015. "The value of state education to consumers," University of Cyprus Working Papers in Economics 05-2015, University of Cyprus Department of Economics.
    16. Callan, Tim & Nolan, Brian, 1991. "Concepts of Poverty and the Poverty Line," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(3), pages 243-261.
    17. Ismael Ahamdanech-Zarco & John A. Bishop & Andrew Grodner & Haiyong Liu, 2011. "Subjective poverty equivalence scales for Euro Zone countries," Working Papers 233, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality.
    18. Pradhan, Menno & Ravallion, Martin, 1998. "Measuring poverty using qualitative perceptions of welfare," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2011, The World Bank.
    19. Balisacan, Arsenio M., 1992. "Equivalence Scale and Poverty Assessment in a Poor Country," Philippine Journal of Development JPD 1992 Vol. XIX No. 1-c, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
    20. Erlangga Agustino Landiyanto, 2022. "Comparison of Child Poverty Measures: Looking for Consensus," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 15(1), pages 35-66, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ubóstwo; nierównoœci; pomiar ubóstwa; wielowymiarowe indeksy ubóstwa; zagro¿enie ubóstwem; Strategia Lizboñska;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I32 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - Measurement and Analysis of Poverty

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:isd:wpaper:59. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Milena Borkowska (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/issghpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.