IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ipt/iptwpa/jrc118071.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The AI Techno-Economic Segment Analysis

Author

Abstract

The Techno-Economics Segment (TES) analytical approach aims to offer a timely representation of an integrated and very dynamic technological domain not captured by official statistics or standard classifications. Domains of that type, such as photonics and artificial intelligence (AI), are rapidly evolving and expected to play a key role in the digital transformation, enabling further developments. They are therefore policy relevant and it is important to have available a methodology and tools suitable to map their geographic presence, technological development, economic impact, and overall evolution. The TES approach was developed by the JRC. It provides quantitative analyses in a micro-based perspective. AI has become an area of strategic importance with potential to be a key driver of economic development. The Commission announced in April 2018 a European strategy on AI in its communication "Artificial Intelligence for Europe", COM(2018)237, and in December a Coordinated Action Plan, COM(2018)795. In order to provide quantitative evidences for monitoring AI technologies in the worldwide economies, the TES approach is applied to AI in the present study. The general aim of this work is to provide an analysis of the AI techno-economic complex system, addressing the following three fundamental research questions: (i) Which are the economic players involved in the research and development as well as in the production and commercialisation of AI goods and services? And where are they located? (ii) Which specific technological areas (under the large umbrella of AI) have these players been working at? (iii) How is the network resulting from their collaboration shaped and what collaborations have they been developing? This report addresses these research questions throughout its different sections, providing both an overview of the AI landscape and a deep understanding of the structure of the socio-economic system, offering useful insights for possible policy initiatives. This is even more relevant and challenging as the considered technologies are consolidating and introducing deep changes in the economy and the society. From this perspective, the goal of this report is to draw a detailed map of the considered ecosystem, and to analyse it in a multidimensional way, while keeping the policy perspective in mind. The period considered in our analysis covers from 2009 to 2018. We detected close to 58,000 relevant documents and, identified 34,000 players worldwide involved in AI-related economic processes. We collected and processed information regarding these players to set up a basis from which the exploration of the ecosystem can take multiple directions depending on the targeted objective. In this report, we present indicators regarding three dimensions of analysis: (i) the worldwide landscape overview, (ii) the involvement of players in specific AI technological sub-domains, and (iii) the activities and the collaborations in AI R&D processes. These are just some of the dimensions that can be investigated with the TES approach. We are currently including and analysing additional ones.

Suggested Citation

  • Giuditta De Prato & Montserrat Lopez Cobo & Sofia Samoili & Riccardo Righi & Miguel Vazquez Prada Baillet & Melisande Cardona, 2019. "The AI Techno-Economic Segment Analysis," JRC Research Reports JRC118071, Joint Research Centre.
  • Handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc118071
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC118071
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hubertus Bardt, 2017. "Autonomous Driving — a Challenge for the Automotive Industry," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 52(3), pages 171-177, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Damioli, Giacomo & Van Roy, Vincent & Vertesy, Daniel & Vivarelli, Marco, 2021. "Will the AI revolution be labour-friendly? Some micro evidence from the supply side," MERIT Working Papers 2021-016, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    2. Damioli, Giacomo & Van Roy, Vincent & Vertesy, Daniel & Vivarelli, Marco, 2021. "May AI Revolution Be Labour-Friendly? Some Micro Evidence from the Supply Side," IZA Discussion Papers 14309, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    3. Davide Castellani & Fabio Lamperti & Katiuscia Lavoratori, 2022. "Measuring adoption of industry 4.0 technologies via international trade data: insights from European countries," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 49(1), pages 51-93, March.
    4. Czarnitzki, Dirk & Fernández, Gastón P. & Rammer, Christian, 2023. "Artificial intelligence and firm-level productivity," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 188-205.
    5. Van Roy, Vincent & Vertesy, Daniel & Damioli, Giacomo, 2019. "AI and Robotics Innovation: a Sectoral and Geographical Mapping using Patent Data," GLO Discussion Paper Series 433, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    6. Sofia Samoili & Montserrat Lopez Cobo & Emilia Gomez & Giuditta De Prato & Fernando Martinez-Plumed & Blagoj Delipetrev, 2020. "AI Watch. Defining Artificial Intelligence. Towards an operational definition and taxonomy of artificial intelligence," JRC Research Reports JRC118163, Joint Research Centre.
    7. Giacomo Damioli & Vincent Van Roy & Daniel Vertesy & Marco Vivarelli, 2021. "Detecting the labour-friendly nature of AI product innovation," DISCE - Quaderni del Dipartimento di Politica Economica dipe0017, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimenti e Istituti di Scienze Economiche (DISCE).
    8. Pietronudo, Maria Cristina & Croidieu, Grégoire & Schiavone, Francesco, 2022. "A solution looking for problems? A systematic literature review of the rationalizing influence of artificial intelligence on decision-making in innovation management," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    9. Riccardo Righi & Montserrat Lopez-Cobo & Georgios Alaveras & Sofia Samoili & Melisande Cardona & Miguel Vazquez-Prada Baillet & Lukasz Ziemba & Giuditta De-Prato, 2020. "Academic Offer of Advanced Digital Skills in 2019-20. International Comparison. Focus on Artificial Intelligence, High Performance Computing, Cybersecurity and Data Science," JRC Research Reports JRC121680, Joint Research Centre.
    10. Righi, Riccardo & Samoili, Sofia & López Cobo, Montserrat & Vázquez-Prada Baillet, Miguel & Cardona, Melisande & De Prato, Giuditta, 2020. "The AI techno-economic complex System: Worldwide landscape, thematic subdomains and technological collaborations," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(6).
    11. Giacomo Damioli & Vincent Van Roy & Daniel Vertesy, 2021. "The impact of artificial intelligence on labor productivity," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 11(1), pages 1-25, March.
    12. DE NIGRIS Sarah & CRAGLIA Massimo & NEPELSKI Daniel & HRADEC Jiri & GOMEZ-GONZALES Emilio & GOMEZ GUTIERREZ Emilia & VAZQUEZ-PRADA BAILLET Miguel & RIGHI Riccardo & DE PRATO Giuditta & LOPEZ COBO Mont, 2020. "AI Watch : AI Uptake in Health and Healthcare, 2020," JRC Research Reports JRC122675, Joint Research Centre.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liao, Peng & Tang, Tie-Qiao & Wang, Tao & Zhang, Jian, 2019. "A car-following model accounting for the driving habits," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 525(C), pages 108-118.
    2. Sofia Samoili & Riccardo Righi & Melisande Cardona & Montserrat Lopez-Cobo & Miguel Vazquez-Prada Baillet & Giuditta De-Prato, 2020. "TES analysis of AI Worldwide Ecosystem in 2009-2018," JRC Research Reports JRC120106, Joint Research Centre.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    TES; TECHNO ECONOMIC SEGMENT; AI; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; PREDICT; ICT R&D; DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION ; DIGITAL ECONOMY; INNOVATION;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc118071. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Publication Officer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipjrces.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.