This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Série Seguridade Social Pobres, Pobreza e Cidadania: Os Desafios Recentes da Proteção Social

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Luciana Jaccoud
Abstract

Esse texto tem como objetivo analisar a trajetória recente da seguridade social no Brasil a partir da evolução dos programas contributivos e não-contributivos de garantia de renda. Respondendo, de um lado, à configuração dada pela Constituição Federal às políticas de previdência e de assistência social e, de outro, ao surgimento de programas de transferência de renda voltados à população em situação de extrema pobreza, a proteção social brasileira tem sido objeto de importantes mudanças nos últimos anos. Pretende-se discutir tais mudanças e seus impactos, destacando o movimento de progressiva inclusão de novos grupos de beneficiários, a ampliação da cobertura para uma diversidade maior de situações de risco e o perfil dos beneficiários tendo em vista de sua inserção no mundo de trabalho. Destaca-se também que esse processo de expansão vem sendo acompanhado pelo surgimento de novas tensões, vinculadas tanto ao contexto de precária configuração do mercado de trabalho como às dificuldades em garantir a articulação entre as políticas de combate à pobreza e a consolidação da seguridade social. This paper analyzes the recent trajectory of social security in Brazil from the evolution of the contributive and no contributive income guarantee programs. The Brazilian social protection has gone through important changes in recent years, on the one hand, as an answer to the configuration given by the Federal Constitution to social security and social assistance policies and, on the other hand, to the emergence of cash transfer programs to the extremely poor. The goal is to analyze these changes and its impacts, calling attention to the movement of gradual inclusion of new groups of beneficiaries, to extended coverage of a diversity of risk situations and their participation in the labor market. However, it also emphasizes the incomplete characteristics of this process, which is followed by new tensions, such as the context of precarious configuration of the labor market and the difficulties in guaranteeing the coordination between the anti-poverty policies and the consolidation of the social security.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.ipea.gov.br/sites/000/2/publicacoes/tds/td_1372.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada - IPEA in its series Discussion Papers with number 1372.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 32 pages
Date of creation: Jan 2009
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:ipe:ipetds:1372

Contact details of provider:
Postal: SBS - Quadra 01 - Bloco J - Ed. BNDES, Bras�lia, DF - 70076-90
Phone: +55(061)315-5000
Fax: +55(61)321-1597
Email:
Web page: http://www.ipea.gov.br
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Fabio Schiavinatto).

Related research
Keywords:

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? The RePEc project started in 1997. Its precursor, NetEc, dates back to 1993.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-21.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.