This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Respeito às Normas e Crescimento Econômico: Como Promotores Públicos Garantem o Cumprimento das Leis e Promovem o Crescimento Econômico no Brasil

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Salo Vinocur Coslovsky
Abstract

Esta pesquisa examina como os membros do Ministério Público (MP) brasileiro conseguem que empresas instaladas em território nacional cumpram com a legislação trabalhista e ambiental sem perder a competitividade. Nos casos analisados, promotores e procuradores percebem que os gargalos que dificultam o cumprimento da lei estão freqüentemente fora das empresas infratoras e de suas respectivas cadeias de valor, e que, portanto, abordagens baseadas em punição, persuasão ou educação – todas centradas na empresa – não são suficientes. Para promover o cumprimento das leis esses agentes públicos localizam e dimensionam os gargalos mais importantes e montam um time composto por instituições públicas, privadas e não-governamentais dispostas a compartilhar os riscos e benefícios associados com a remoção desses gargalos e a mudança na estrutura produtiva das empresas em questão. Na prática, esse processo, que os promotores e procuradores chamam de “costura”, modifica o ambiente onde as empresas operam de forma a tornar o cumprimento da lei a alternativa mais simples e óbvia para todos os envolvidos. This paper examines how Brazilian prosecutors promote compliance with labor and environmental laws while preserving or even enhancing the competitiveness of local firms. In the cases analyzed, prosecutors realize that the bottlenecks that prevent compliance are often located outside the firm and its immediate value chain, so punishment or pedagogy, when used in isolation, are not likely yield meaningful results. Instead, they locate key bottlenecks, assess them, and then, depending on the task ahead, bring together a series of public, private, and non-profit institutions willing to share, according to their respective tolerance and ambition, the risks and benefits associated with the necessary change. This process, which prosecutors themselves call “to stitch it together”, effectively modifies the environment in which firms operate so as to make compliance the easy and obvious choice for all involved.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.ipea.gov.br/sites/000/2/publicacoes/tds/td_1355.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada - IPEA in its series Discussion Papers with number 1355.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 31 pages
Date of creation: Aug 2008
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:ipe:ipetds:1355

Contact details of provider:
Postal: SBS - Quadra 01 - Bloco J - Ed. BNDES, Bras�lia, DF - 70076-90
Phone: +55(061)315-5000
Fax: +55(61)321-1597
Email:
Web page: http://www.ipea.gov.br
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Fabio Schiavinatto).

Related research
Keywords:

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? RePEc data is maintained by each archive holder on its own website. Nothing is held centrally.

This page was last updated on 2010-1-6.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.