Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Compras Governamentais para o Programa Nacional do Livro Didático: Uma Discussão Sobre a Eficiência do Governo

Contents:

Author Info

  • Ricardo Pereira Soares
Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    The current National Schoolbook Program (PNLD) was started in 1985 by Decree 91.542, which brought substantial changes compared to earlier attempted programs, such as which established that the choice of the schoolbook would be made directly by the professor. The basic question this study tries to answer is: could the government, which buys 90% of the production of schoolbook in Brazil, be more cost effective in the execution of PNLD? This study shows that the government brought books from 110 publishers during the period 1998-2006, spending R$ 4.5 billion, but, due to the oligopoly in the book market, only 6 publishers houses, Abril, Santillana, FTD, Saraiva, IBEP, Ediouro e Editora Brasil received R$ 3.893,3 million, corresponding to 87% of total expenditures in schoolbook. The study indicates that this concentration of expenditures in few firms is due to the high expenses of the publishers advertising, influencing the teachers? choices. The study concludes that the government utilizes only partially its procurement power in the accomplishment of the PNLD, since it demands pedagogic quality of the schoolbooks, but did not purchase in the regions where they will be used. If the government did so it would permit the reduction of the distribution and transportation costs and conversely encouraging more competition between publishers and, thus, reducing the books prices. In conclusion, this study infers that the government could be more efficient in the execution of the PNLD if it changes the current procurement rules, establishing new conditions in the acquisitions of didactic books. With this perspective, the government should use in its own benefit the Author?s Copyright Law or adopt new concepts of choosing the schoolbook by the professors, and increasing competition among publishers.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://www.ipea.gov.br/portal/images/stories/PDFs/TDs/td_1307.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada - IPEA in its series Discussion Papers with number 1307.

    as in new window
    Length: 41 pages
    Date of creation: Nov 2007
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:ipe:ipetds:1307

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: SBS - Quadra 01 - Bloco J - Ed. BNDES, Brasília, DF - 70076-90
    Phone: +55(061)315-5000
    Fax: +55(61)321-1597
    Email:
    Web page: http://www.ipea.gov.br
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords:

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipe:ipetds:1307. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Fabio Schiavinatto).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.