Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

Uma Agenda Parcial de Reformas para 2009: À Procura de um "Pacto de Toledo" Brasileiro

Contents:

Author Info

  • Fabio Giambiagi
  • Paulo Tafner
Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    The article suggests a calendar of partial reforms of Brazilian Social Security, considering as a premise that in 2009 a ?window of opportunity" will be open up, creating the political conditions for cooperation between the government and the opposition. This would allow the country to recreate political agreements like those known as ?Pact of Toledo?, that threw the bases of Spain?s Welfare State, built on political agreements that conduced the theme as a matter of State instead of a matter of a government. More specifically, this article suggests INSS (Brazilian Social Security Institute) should adopt a minimum age for retirement of time of contribution regime, like the rule that it is already worth for the civil servants. It also recommends the reduction of the difference of retirement requirement between men and women to four years; the increase of the requirement for retirement for age by one year; the enactment of a limit to the portion of the pension benefit that exceeds the floor benefit to 70% of the original benefit, when survivor has no children; the extension of the rule that increases the contributive for retirement of age by 6 months per year up to 2031; and the imposition of a two-year the difference between eligibility ages for the retirement and for the assistance benefit of LOAS. In some of those cases, it should be necessary to shift current rules, such as in the case of the rural benefits. The change of the rules would be preceded by a five-year lack. These rules should be substantially tougher for those who come to the job market after the approval of the changes. In addition, we propose a progressive reduction of the Social Security Contributions in way to reduce the cost of labor and to stimulate the formal labor relationship. Nevertheless, the proposed rules may still be considered benevolent measures to those actually in force of several countries in the world. We hope that this proposition may enable a greater degree of adhesion by the Brazilian political forces.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://www.ipea.gov.br/portal/images/stories/PDFs/TDs/td_1299.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada - IPEA in its series Discussion Papers with number 1299.

    as in new window
    Length: 43 pages
    Date of creation: Aug 2007
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:ipe:ipetds:1299

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: SBS - Quadra 01 - Bloco J - Ed. BNDES, Brasília, DF - 70076-90
    Phone: +55(061)315-5000
    Fax: +55(61)321-1597
    Email:
    Web page: http://www.ipea.gov.br
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords:

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipe:ipetds:1299. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Fabio Schiavinatto).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.