IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ipe/ipetds/1256.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Importância da Queda Recente da Desigualdade na Redução da Pobreza

Author

Listed:
  • Ricardo Paes de Barros
  • Mirela de Carvalho
  • Samuel Franco
  • Rosane Mendonça

Abstract

In this study we document the contribution of the recent decline on income inequality to the income?s growth of the poorest and consequently to the reduction of poverty and extreme poverty in the country. First, we investigate the income growth of the poorest. We demonstrated that, between 2001 and 2005, the national income grew 0,9% a year, but the richest lost. The annual income growth rate of the richest 10% and 20% was negative (?0,3 and ?0,1, respectively). Then, once the national income grew, the poorest necessarily have perceived some gain. In fact, the income growth rate of the poorest 10% reached 8% a.a. Therefore, the 2001?2005 period register two desirable transformations in the Brazilian income distribution: there was growth (although very modest) and the degree of inequality reduced significantly (the Gini coefficient, for example, decline 4,6%). Next, we analyze the huge decline on poverty in this period. We demonstrated that, on the contrary to the history of the country, the recent decline on poverty essentially resulted from the decline of inequality. The percentage of poor and also the extremely poor fell down 4,5 percentage points each. The novelty is that in this period the main determinant was the inequality decline and not the income growth. Finally, we investigate the degree of substitution and complementation between growth and inequality reductions to fight against poverty. We demonstrated that to reach the same decline on poverty, just counting with growth, it would be necessary to increase the income of all families in 14,5%, and to reach the same decline on extreme poverty it would be necessary to increase the income of all families in 22%.

Suggested Citation

  • Ricardo Paes de Barros & Mirela de Carvalho & Samuel Franco & Rosane Mendonça, 2007. "A Importância da Queda Recente da Desigualdade na Redução da Pobreza," Discussion Papers 1256, Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada - IPEA.
  • Handle: RePEc:ipe:ipetds:1256
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ipea.gov.br/portal/images/stories/PDFs/TDs/td_1256.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pereira, Matheus W. Gomes & Teixeira, Erly Cardoso & Gurgel, Ângelo Costa, 2009. "Economic Loss to the Brazilian Regions Due to the Doha Round Failure," Conference papers 331848, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    2. Berchin, Issa Ibrahim & Nunes, Nei Antonio & de Amorim, Wellyngton Silva & Alves Zimmer, Gabriel Alfredo & da Silva, Franciani Rodrigues & Fornasari, Vitória Haendchen & Sima, Mihaela & de Andrade Gue, 2019. "The contributions of public policies for strengthening family farming and increasing food security: The case of Brazil," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 573-584.
    3. Samir Cury & Euclides Pedrozo, 2016. "Cash Transfer Policies, Taxation and the Fall in Inequality in Brazil An Integrated Microsimulation-CGE Analysis [equilibrium model, microsimulation model, Brazil. Classification-JEL: C68, D58, I38," International Journal of Microsimulation, International Microsimulation Association, vol. 9(1), pages 55-85.
    4. Victor Medeiros & Rafael Saulo Marques Ribeiro & Pedro Vasconscelos Maia do Amaral, 2022. "Infrastructure and income inequality: An application to the Brazilian case using hierarchical spatial autoregressive models," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(5), pages 1467-1486, November.
    5. Nadia von Jacobi, 2014. "Can the Context Mediate Macro-Policy Outcomes?: Contextual Differences in the Returns to Bolsa Familia in Brazil," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2014-049, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipe:ipetds:1256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Fabio Schiavinatto (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipeaabr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.