This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Is Asia adopting flexicurity? A survey of employment policies in six countries

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Vandenberg, Paul (International Management Institute, New Delhi)
Abstract

The survey analyzes policies that provide flexibility for employers and security for workers in Asia. The cases exhibit distinct sub-regional patterns. India and Sri Lanka, in South Asia, provide (employer-based) ‘employment security’ and have not transitioned to broader systems of ‘labour market security’ as envisioned by the flexicurity model. China and Korea, in Northeast Asia, have made that transition over the past decade by reducing restrictions on retrenchment while introducing unemployment insurance and active measures. In Southeast Asia, Singapore and Malaysia offer flexible systems with strong active policies but low security in terms of employment protection and passive measures. The above characterizations apply to the formal economy. In China, India and Sri Lanka, where the informal and rural economies are large, governments have used public works, self-employment programs and skills training to support labour market outcomes.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.ilo.org/public/english/employment/download/elm/elm08-4.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function: First version,2008
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by International Labour Office in its series Economic and Labour Market Papers with number 2008-04.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 54 pages
Date of creation: 2008
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:ilo:empelm:2008-04

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Employment Sector, International Labour Office, 4 route des Morillons, CH 1211 Geneve 22, Switzerland
Phone: +41/22/799.7343
Fax: +41/22/799.7678
Email:
Web page: http://www.ilo.org/public/english/employment/strat
More information through EDIRC

Order Information:
Email:

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Anne Drougard).

Related research
Keywords: Labour flexibility / employment security / employment policy / labour policy / China / Korea R / India / Malaysia / Singapore / Sri Lanka;

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
  1. Herwig Immervoll, 2007. "Minimum Wages, Minimum Labour Costs and the Tax Treatment of Low-Wage Employment," IZA Discussion Papers 2555, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA). [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  2. Janine Berg & Sandrine Cazes, 2007. "The Doing Business Indicators: Measurement issues and political implications," Economic and Labour Market Papers 2007-06, International Labour Office. [Downloadable!]
  3. Peter Auer, 2007. "Security in labour markets: Combining flexibility with security for decent work," Economic and Labour Market Papers 2007-12, International Labour Office. [Downloadable!]
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? All RePEc services are meant to be be free forever, as they are all run by volunteers.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-13.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.