IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iim/iimawp/wp01493.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Characterizing the Equal Income Market Equilibrium Choice Correspondence: Average Envy Freeness Instead of Individual Rationality from Equal Division

Author

Listed:
  • Lahiri Somdeb

Abstract

In problems of fair division of a given bundle of resources, amongst a finite number of agents, individual rationality from equal division plays a significant role. In a society, where all resources are socially owned, one cannot argue in terms of equal ownership of the social endowment. One normally takes the position that each agents has the right to veto any allocation, which leaves him/her worse than equal division. Based on this premise, individual rationality from equal division has been proposed as a minimal requirement of distributive justice. In Thomson (1982), we find an equity criterion called average envy-freeness, which in the context of economies with convex preferences, implies individual rationality from equal division. Average envy-freeness says that no agent finds the average consumption of the other agents, superior to his/her own consumption. This concept has been developed in the Foley (1967) tradition of an envy-free allocation: no agent should find his/her consumption inferior to the consumption of any other agents. We show in this paper (the not too difficult result) that average envy-freeness does not automatically imply individual rationality from equal division. A solution concept which recurs with seeming regularity in the literature of fair division is the equal income market equilibrium solution concept. In a variable population framework Thomson (1988) provides an axiomatic characterization, using the axiom of consistency. Consistency basically says that the departure of some agents with their allocated consumption, should not affect the consumption of the remaining agents, provided they operate the same distribution mechanism as before, Lahiri (1997a 1997b) use this same axiom to characterize the equal income market equilibrium choice correspondence in convex and non-convex environments. Out main result reported in this paper is similar to a Lahir (1997b) result, although it may not extend to the non-convex economies considered there. It is thus a modest generalization of the Thomson (1988) result. We use consistency, replication invariance, efficiency and average envy-freeness to show that if a solution satisfies these properties, it must consist of equal income market equilibrium allocations. Subsequently we drop consistency and arrive at yet another characterization of subsolutions of equal income market equilibrium choice correspondence using the strict envy-freeness property due to Zhou (1992).

Suggested Citation

  • Lahiri Somdeb, 1997. "Characterizing the Equal Income Market Equilibrium Choice Correspondence: Average Envy Freeness Instead of Individual Rationality from Equal Division," IIMA Working Papers WP1997-12-01_01493, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
  • Handle: RePEc:iim:iimawp:wp01493
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iim:iimawp:wp01493. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eciimin.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.