IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iim/iimawp/8312.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Rethinking the Priorities for Indian Agricultural Research, Institutions and Policy: Learning from the Grassroots

Author

Listed:
  • Gupta, Anil K.

Abstract

Sometimes having succeeded in a mission, we fail because we tend to persist with the same strategy even when times have changed. The success, thus, becomes the reason for failure. Indian agriculture research has been an outstanding success in terms of achieving food self-reliance and converting a perennially importing country to an exporting country. But, the trend in the last decade has been disappointing and reasons are not far to seek. I will take this opportunity to reflect on the three decades of my engagement with the agricultural research community so that some new pointers can be identified. I will also share the lessons learnt from the grassroots innovators and traditional knowledge holders through Honey Bee Network activities in the last two decades. It is possible that some of my views cause discomfort. But, it is with great respect that I submit these ideas. The agricultural research community has always considered me as an insider and therefore the liberty that they have allowed me to take with the ideas. The interface of science and society, which has become a bit weaker in recent years, was taken as a matter of deep concern and commitment. It is a privilege for me to share my views in Dr B P Pal's memory. I hope to help in triggering some thoughts towards revitalisation of our institutions, policy making approach and our relationship with the common people and their creativity. Paper deals with mainly four issues, viz., (i) Managing genetic resources, (ii) Rethinking sustainability, (iii) Redesigning research organisations for sustainable, accessible and affordable outcomes and (iv) Ethical and institutional issues in agricultural research. The quality of education, development of entrepreneurial spirit, monitoring eco system health and developing longitudinal research facilities are some of the other important concerns in the Indian agricultural research system. When plant breeding got dominated by the practice of making selections in international nurseries and releasing varieties instead of painstaking seven to eight year breeding cycles of complex crossing programmes, the faster mortality of such rapidly released varieties was inevitable. The incentive systems for scientists unfortunately have not been upgraded and calibrated in a manner that social, professional and individual interests can converge. The organisational design does not let new forms of partnerships and networks to emerge. The current crisis in Indian agriculture is a consequence of the outdated policies and irrelevant organisational and institutional designs. There is no escape from major restructuring of agricultural research policy and institutions. I may be forgiven for being too critical at several places in my submission. Thousands of innovations and traditional knowledge identified from more than 500 districts have proved, if a proof was needed that Indian farmers, artisans, pastoralists and mechanics are extremely creative and engagement with them can not be avoided by institutional science for too long without inviting an unfortunate backlash.

Suggested Citation

  • Gupta, Anil K., 2009. "Rethinking the Priorities for Indian Agricultural Research, Institutions and Policy: Learning from the Grassroots," IIMA Working Papers WP2009-03-04, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
  • Handle: RePEc:iim:iimawp:8312
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.iima.ac.in/sites/default/files/rnpfiles/2009-03-04Gupta.pdf
    File Function: English Version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iim:iimawp:8312. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eciimin.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.