This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Sanctioning North Korea: The Political Economy of Denuclearization and Proliferation

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Stephan Haggard () (University of California, San Diego Graduate School of International Relations and Pacific Studies)
Marcus Noland () (Peterson Institute for International Economics)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

As a small country dependent on foreign trade and investment, North Korea should be highly vulnerable to external economic pressure. In June 2009, following North Korea's second nuclear test, the UN Security Council passed Resolution 1874, broadening existing economic sanctions and tightening their enforcement. However, an unintended consequence of the nuclear crisis has been to push North Korea into closer economic relations with China and other trading partners that show little interest in cooperating with international efforts to pressure North Korea, let alone in supporting sanctions. North Korea appears to have rearranged its external economic relations to reduce any impact that traditional sanctions could have. Given the extremely high priority the North Korean regime places on its military capacity, it is unlikely that the pressure the world can bring to bear on North Korea will be sufficient to induce the country to surrender its nuclear weapons. The promise of lifting existing sanctions may provide one incentive for a successor government to reassess the country's military and diplomatic positions, but sanctions alone are unlikely to have a strong effect in the short run. Yet the United States and other countries can still exercise some leverage if they aggressively pursue North Korea's international financial intermediaries as they have done at times in the past.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.piie.com/publications/wp/wp09-4.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Peterson Institute for International Economics in its series Peterson Institute Working Paper Series with number WP09-4.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: Jul 2009
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:iie:wpaper:wp09-4

Contact details of provider:
Postal: 1750 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20036-1903
Phone: 202-328-9000
Fax: 202-659-3225
Email:
Web page: http://www.petersoninstitute.org/
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Helen Hillebrand).

Related research
Keywords: sanctions; North Korea; nuclear weapons;

Find related papers by JEL classification:
F51 - International Economics - - International Relations and International Political Economy - - - International Conflicts; Negotiations; Sanctions
P33 - Economic Systems - - Socialist Institutions and Their Transitions - - - International Linkages
P30 - Economic Systems - - Socialist Institutions and Their Transitions - - - General

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? Authors can create their own profile with links to their works on the RePEc Author Service.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-23.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.