IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iie/pbrief/pb20-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

When more delivers less: Comparing the US and French COVID-19 crisis responses

Author

Listed:
  • Jérémie Cohen-Setton

    (Peterson Institute for International Economics)

  • Jean Pisani-Ferry

    (Peterson Institute for International Economics)

Abstract

The US package of measures to help households hit by the economic shock from the COVID-19 crisis, including the Paycheck Protection Program, is almost twice as large in proportion of GDP as the French package, but it has proven less effective in curbing unemployment because of poor design and implementation. In contrast, the increase in the unemployment rate in France has been five times less than the increase in the United States. Cohen-Setton and Pisani-Ferry dive beneath the unreliable headline numbers to assess the effectiveness of government support provided to households in March–May 2020 in the two countries. They conclude that the French approach (mirrored in some other European countries) delivered a bigger bang for the buck. But the fact that the US approach has fallen short should not diminish the significance of the policy shift signaled by the enactment of measures to maintain household income.

Suggested Citation

  • Jérémie Cohen-Setton & Jean Pisani-Ferry, 2020. "When more delivers less: Comparing the US and French COVID-19 crisis responses," Policy Briefs PB20-9, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:iie:pbrief:pb20-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.piie.com/publications/policy-briefs/when-more-delivers-less-comparing-us-and-french-covid-19-crisis-responses
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iie:pbrief:pb20-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peterson Institute webmaster (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iieeeus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.