Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

The Role of the IMF: A Guide to the Reports

Contents:

Author Info

  • John Williamson

    ()
    (Peterson Institute for International Economics)

Abstract

Many of the discussions on a new international financial architecture that were spawned by the east Asian crisis have dealt with the future role of the International Monetary Fund (IMF). This policy brief starts by summarizing the recommendations of five recent reports and one speech, and the reasoning that lies behind them. These recommendations are divided into four major areas: 1) the scope of Fund activities, 2) surveillance, 3) lending, and 4) governance (on which topic I also summarize the views of a recent academic paper). I offer my own verdict on the first three of these topics in the last section of this brief.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://www.piie.com/publications/pb/pb.cfm?ResearchID=66
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by Peterson Institute for International Economics in its series Policy Briefs with number PB00-5.

as in new window
Length:
Date of creation: May 2000
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:iie:pbrief:pb00-05

Contact details of provider:
Postal: 1750 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20036-1903
Phone: 202-328-9000
Fax: 202-659-3225
Email:
Web page: http://www.piie.com
More information through EDIRC

Related research

Keywords:

References

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as in new window

Cited by:
  1. Kalonga Stambuli, 2002. "Political Change, Economic Transition and Catalysis of IMF and World Bank Models - the case of Malawi," Macroeconomics, EconWPA 0211003, EconWPA.
  2. Nunnenkamp, Peter, 2003. "Reforming the international financial architecture: What globalization critics demand and what policymakers have (not) achieved," Journal of Financial Transformation, Capco Institute, Capco Institute, vol. 9, pages 39-46.
  3. Thomas D. Willett, 2002. "Towards A Broader Public Choice Analysis of the International Monetary Fund," Claremont Colleges Working Papers, Claremont Colleges 2002-25, Claremont Colleges.
  4. Nunnenkamp, Peter, 2007. "Internationale Finanzpolitik," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW) 4321, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW).
  5. Yilmaz AKYüZ, 2005. "Reforming The Imf: Back To The Drawing Board," G-24 Discussion Papers, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development 38, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
  6. Morris Goldstein, 2000. "Strengthening the International Financial Architecture: Where Do We Stand?," Working Paper Series, Peterson Institute for International Economics WP00-8, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
  7. Peter Leeson & Christopher Coyne, 2007. "The reformers’ dilemma: media, policy ownership, and reform," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 237-250, June.
  8. Cartapanis A. & Herland M., 2001. "Systemic Risk and New International Financial Architecture: Reconciling KEYNES and Neo-Liberalism?," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1-2), pages 5-26, January -.
  9. Cohen, Daniel & Portes, Richard, 2004. "Dealing with Destabilizing 'Market Discipline'," CEPR Discussion Papers, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers 4280, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  10. Giulio Federico, 2001. "IMF Conditionality," Economics Papers 2001-W19, Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford, revised 01 Sep 2001.
  11. Michael Bordo & Anna J. Schwartz, 2001. "From the Exchange Stabilization Fund to the International Monetary Fund," NBER Working Papers 8100, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  12. Morris Goldstein, 2001. "IMF Structural Conditionality: How Much is Too Much?," Working Paper Series, Peterson Institute for International Economics WP01-4, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
  13. Heinz Handler, 2008. "From the Bancor to the Euro. And Further on to the Intor?," WIFO Working Papers, WIFO 317, WIFO.
  14. Bird, Graham, 2002. "The credibility and signalling effect of IMF programmes," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 24(9), pages 799-811, December.
  15. Ricardo J. Caballero, 2003. "The Future of the IMF," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, American Economic Association, vol. 93(2), pages 31-38, May.

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iie:pbrief:pb00-05. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Peterson Institute webmaster).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.