cuts. This compares to 74% for the forecast made by the Treasury

12 months earlier. As well as clarifying how cautious forecasts are,

the uncertainty surrounding projections for fiscal aggregates also

has implications for the way in which progress towards any fiscal

rules should be interpreted.

">

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Updating the UK's code for fiscal stability

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Carl Emmerson () (Institute for Fiscal Studies)
Christine Frayne
Sarah Love (Institute for Fiscal Studies)
Abstract

The 1998 Code for Fiscal Stability sets out the framework within

which UK fiscal policy is now set. While having such a code does

not make it easier for a Government to meet its fiscal objectives, it

may improve the economic credibility of the policy process. To date

the Code has generally worked well, and in any case many of the

Treasury's practices exceed the minimum requirements of the Code.

However, improvements could be made in the light of recent

experiences. In particular it would be preferable for less emphasis to

be placed on the precise forecasts for fiscal aggregates and greater

emphasis to be placed on the magnitude of the risks to those

forecasts. Using the projections contained in the March 2004

Budget, and information on the size of errors made in the past, we

estimate that there is now a 60% chance that the Chancellor's

"golden rule" will be met without further tax increases or spending

cuts. This compares to 74% for the forecast made by the Treasury

12 months earlier. As well as clarifying how cautious forecasts are,

the uncertainty surrounding projections for fiscal aggregates also

has implications for the way in which progress towards any fiscal

rules should be interpreted.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.ifs.org.uk/wps/wp0429.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Institute for Fiscal Studies in its series IFS Working Papers with number W04/29.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML, plain text, BibTeX, RIS (EndNote), ReDIF
Length: 45 pp.
Date of creation: Nov 2004
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:ifs:ifsewp:04/29

Contact details of provider:
Postal: The Institute for Fiscal Studies 7 Ridgmount Street LONDON WC1E 7AE
Phone: (+44) 020 7291 4800
Fax: (+44) 020 7323 4780
Email:
Web page: http://www.ifs.org.uk

Order Information:
Postal: The Institute for Fiscal Studies 7 Ridgmount Street LONDON WC1E 7AE
Email:

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Emma Hyman).

Related research
Keywords:

Find related papers by JEL classification:
E62 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook - - - Fiscal Policy
H62 - Public Economics - - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt - - - Deficit; Surplus

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
  1. Suman Basu & Carl Emmerson & Christine Frayne, 2003. "An examination of the IFS corporation tax forecasting record," IFS Working Papers W03/21, Institute for Fiscal Studies. [Downloadable!]
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? There are over 16000 authors registered on RePEc Author Service.

This page was last updated on 2008-8-13.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.