Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

Exploring cost dominance between high and low pesticide use in French crop farming systems by varying scale and output mix

Contents:

Author Info

  • Jean-Philippe Boussemart

    ()
    (IESEG School of Management)

  • Hervé Leleu

    (CNRS-LEM (UMR 8179) and IESEG School of Management)

  • Oluwaseun Ojo

    (IESEG School of Management (LEM-CNRS))

Abstract

Policy makers as well as land users in developed countries are willing to promote new agricultural practices that are more environmentally friendly. This can be possible notably among several others by reducing chemical utilization. For instance in France, the agreement of the “Grenelle de l’environnement” encourages farmers to decrease pesticide use per ha about 50% over a period of ten years. This paper deals with a framework which aims at assessing the cost dominance between technologies that favor less or more pesticide levels per ha. Cost functions are estimated thanks to a non-parametric activity analysis model and a robust approach frontier is introduced in order to lessen the sensitivity of the cost frontier to the influence of potential outliers. With respect to this, two cost functions characterized by a relatively lower or higher pesticide level per ha are compared. Based on a sample of 707 French crop farms observed in year 2008, our simulations clearly show that agricultural practices using less pesticide per ha are more cost competitive than practices using more pesticide without inducing other input substitution costs. In addition, results are differentiated by farm size and types of crop to identify possible scale and output mix effects. They reveal that this cost dominance is a robust phenomenon across size and scope dimensions and economically support more green practices in terms of crop activities.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://my.ieseg.fr/bienvenue/DownloadDoc.asp?Fich=231112724_2012-ECO-11_Leleu.pdf
Download Restriction: no

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by IESEG School of Management in its series Working Papers with number 2012-ECO-11.

as in new window
Length: 28 pages
Date of creation: Jun 2012
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:ies:wpaper:e201211

Contact details of provider:
Postal: 3, rue de la Digue, FR-59000 Lille
Phone: +33/320545892
Fax: +33/320574855
Web page: http://www.ieseg.fr/
More information through EDIRC

Related research

Keywords: Pesticide Use (PU); Cash crops farming systems; Activity Analysis Model (AAM); Non Parametric Robust Cost Function (NPRCF); Hamming Distance (HD);

Find related papers by JEL classification:

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
as in new window
  1. Simar, L. & Wilson, P.W., 1999. "Statistical Inference in Nonparametric Frontier Models: the State of the Art," Papers 9904, Catholique de Louvain - Institut de statistique.
  2. Boussemart, Jean-Philippe & Leleu, Herve & Ojo, Oluwaseun, 2011. "Could Society’s willingness to reduce pesticide use be aligned with Farmers’ economic self-interest?," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 120402, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
  3. Timo Kuosmanen & Diemuth Pemsl & Justus Wesseler, 2006. "Specification and Estimation of Production Functions Involving Damage Control Inputs: A Two-Stage, Semiparametric Approach," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 88(2), pages 499-511.
  4. Vanloqueren, Gaëtan & Baret, Philippe V., 2008. "Why are ecological, low-input, multi-resistant wheat cultivars slow to develop commercially? A Belgian agricultural 'lock-in' case study," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(2-3), pages 436-446, June.
  5. Cazals, Catherine & Florens, Jean-Pierre & Simar, Leopold, 2002. "Nonparametric frontier estimation: a robust approach," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 106(1), pages 1-25, January.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

Citations

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ies:wpaper:e201211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Monika Marin).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.