Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Land tenure and productivity: Farm level evidence from Papua New Guinea

Contents:

Author Info

  • Satish Chand
  • Charles Yala

Abstract

Does land tenure form affect farm level productivity? The answer, from farm level data for oil palm from the Hoskins project in West New Britain province of Papua New Guinea, is in the affirmative. Analysis of farm level output, controlling for all measured inputs, shows systematic differences in productivity across three land tenure types; namely, farms under customary purchase agreements (CP), those under the land settlement scheme (LSS), and those under village owned land schemes (VOP). The evidence is that productivity is higher under the CP and LSS schemes compared to the VOP arrangement. The empirics suggests that the higher productivity is due to benefits from economies of scale enjoyed by farms with improved tenure security and from the absence of sharing of income and harvesting effort that is present on farms with insecure tenure.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: https://crawford.anu.edu.au/degrees/idec/working_papers/IDEC08-02.pdf
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by International and Development Economics in its series International and Development Economics Working Papers with number idec08-02.

as in new window
Length: 31 pages
Date of creation: 2008
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:idc:wpaper:idec08-02

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Crawford Building, Lennox Crossing, Building #132, Canberra ACT 0200
Phone: +61 2 6125 4705
Fax: +61 2 6125 5448
Email:
Web page: https://crawford.anu.edu.au/research/papers/
More information through EDIRC

Related research

Keywords:

Other versions of this item:

Find related papers by JEL classification:

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
as in new window
  1. Carter, Michael R. & Olinto, Pedro, 2000. "Getting Institutions 'Right' for Whom: Credit Constraints and the Impact of Property Rights on the Quantity and Compostiton of Investment," Staff Paper Series 433, University of Wisconsin, Agricultural and Applied Economics.
  2. Gavian, Sarah & Ehui, Simeon, 1999. "Measuring the production efficiency of alternative land tenure contracts in a mixed crop-livestock system in Ethiopia," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 20(1), pages 37-49, January.
  3. Myyra, Sami & Pietola, Kyosti, 2006. "Exploring long-term land improvements under land tenure insecurity," 2006 Conference, August 24-25, 2006, Nelson, New Zealand 31954, New Zealand Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
  4. Gavian, Sarah & Ehui, Simeon, 1999. "Measuring the production efficiency of alternative land tenure contracts in a mixed crop-livestock system in Ethiopia," Agricultural Economics: The Journal of the International Association of Agricultural Economists, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 20(1), January.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

Citations

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:idc:wpaper:idec08-02. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Webmaster).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.