This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Loan Deficiency Payments versus Countercyclical Payments: Do We Need Both for a Price Safety Net?

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Chad E. Hart
Bruce A. Babcock () (Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD), Midwest Agribusiness Trade Research and Information Center (MATRIC))

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

The federal government currently runs two major price support programs in agriculture, the marketing loan and countercyclical payment (CCP) programs. While these programs are both targeted at providing producer price protection, they have different political and financial costs associated with them. We outline these costs and project the effects of various loan rate changes on these programs for eight crops (barley, corn, cotton, oats, rice, sorghum, soybeans, and wheat) for 2005. Loan rate changes affect the price support programs by changing the payment rate producers receive when payments are triggered. We find that the crop's relative price strength versus its loan rate and the relationship between CCP base production and 2005 expected production have the largest influence on how loan rate changes affect outlays from the price support programs for the various crops. Of these crops, cotton is the only one that would be relatively unaffected by loan rate shifts. Corn and soybeans would see the largest declines in overall expenditures from price support programs if loan rates were decreased. Oats and soybeans would experience the largest percentage losses. However, the results also show that the federal government could maintain an agricultural price support structure at a lower cost than it is currently paying. The reduction in cost often comes in situations where the current array of price support programs overcompensates producers for price shortfalls. This shift would also likely find greater acceptance under the World Trade Organization (WTO) agriculture guidelines than would the current structure. For an administration that is looking to rein in deficit spending while at the same time negotiating new WTO guidelines, moving to lower loan rates could be an answer.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.card.iastate.edu/publications/DBS/PDFFiles/05bp44.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function: Full Text
Download Restriction: no
File URL: http://www.card.iastate.edu/publications/synopsis.aspx?id=573
File Format: text/html
File Function: Online Synopsis
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI) at Iowa State University in its series Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI) Publications with number 05-bp44.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: Feb 2005
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:ias:fpaper:05-bp44

Contact details of provider:
Postal: 578 Heady Hall, Ames, IA 50011-1070
Phone: (515)294-1183
Fax: (515)294-6336
Email:
Web page: http://www.fapri.iastate.edu/
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: ().

Related research
Keywords: agricultural loan rates; agricultural marketing loan program; agricultural price supports; countercyclical payments (CCPs); loan deficiency payments (LDPs).;

Other versions of this item:

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports: Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
  1. Brink, Lars, 2005. "WTO Constraints on U.S. and EU Domestic Support in Agriculture: Assessing the October 2005 Proposals," Working Papers 14601, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium. [Downloadable!]
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? You too can volunteer for RePEc, for example by encouraging others to register as authors.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-7.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.