IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ias/cpaper/91-wp79.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Metamodels, Response Functions, and Research Efficiency in Ecological Economics

Author

Listed:
  • Aziz Bouzaher
  • Richard Cabe
  • Alicia L. Carriquiry
  • Jason F. Shogren

Abstract

Analysis of alternative environmental policies often requires execution of computer simulation models of the ecological or economic phenomena involved. This paper explores efficiencies to be gained by using these simulation models in a program of constructing metamodels. Constructing a metamodel involves statistical modeling of a simulation model's output--creating a model of a model. Metamodeling produces response functions that characterize relationships implied by the structure of a simulation model relating variables that appear to be important to policy evaluation. We first make the case for the research efficiency of metamodeling by discussing an integrated policy evaluation system designed for herbicide pollution policies (CEEPES) that could not have been constructed without metamodels. Next, we illustrate the metamodeling concept by describing a particular metamodel from the system.

Suggested Citation

  • Aziz Bouzaher & Richard Cabe & Alicia L. Carriquiry & Jason F. Shogren, 1991. "Metamodels, Response Functions, and Research Efficiency in Ecological Economics," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 91-wp79, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
  • Handle: RePEc:ias:cpaper:91-wp79
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.card.iastate.edu/products/publications/pdf/91wp79.pdf
    File Function: Full Text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.card.iastate.edu/products/publications/synopsis/?p=638
    File Function: Online Synopsis
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ias:cpaper:91-wp79. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/caiasus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.