Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Beschäftigung, Arbeit und Unternehmertum in deutschen Kleinbetrieben : Ergebnisse aus dem IAB-Betriebspanel 2010

Contents:

Author Info

  • Bechmann, Sebastian
  • Dahms, Vera
  • Fischer, Agnes
  • Frei, Marek
  • Leber, Ute

    ()
    (Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany])

  • Möller, Iris

    ()
    (Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany])

Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    "The IAB-Establishment Panel indicates that smaller companies differ from larger ones in several ways. Differences in the employee and owner structure are reflected in the fact that smaller establishments offer knowledge-intensive jobs less often than larger establishments do, are generally owner-managed and usually appear in the market as independent companies without other branches. Differences in economic performance are reflected primarily in lower levels of productivity and wages, but also in the lower export rates of the smaller establishments. The data also show that the rise in employment in 2010 - when the number of employees reached the highest level since German reunification - was very largely driven by employment growth amongst the smallest companies. The rise in employment, in turn, led to an increasing demand for skilled workers. The need for skilled workers and the scale of the problem in filling vacancies for skilled workers were the same as before the financial and economic crisis in 2008/2009. Smaller companies in particular had difficulties in recruiting skilled labour. There were also differences between larger and smaller companies in the way in which fixed-term contracts and temporary agency workers are used. Only a small proportion of the smaller firms used employees with fixed-term contracts or temporary agency workers. In spite of the different framework conditions, the reasons for concluding employees with fixed-term contracts are similar in all size categories. The need for staff for a limited time only was given as the main reason. Overall, the findings indicate that for the majority of employees with fixed-term contracts, employment with fixed-term contract does not represent a bridge to a permanent job in the establishment in which they work. There are also differences between smaller and larger companies in terms of the regulation of working hours. The contractually agreed working hours per week is longer in smaller firms than it is in larger ones. Order peaks still tend to be covered by overtime, especially in larger establishments. Because of the frequent lack of possibilities for compensating overtime work with time off, overtime leads, in smaller companies in particular, to an increase in annual working hours in the long term. In comparison with larger companies, smaller firms more rarely offer training and in addition more frequently have difficulties in filling the training places that they offer. In 2010, most of training graduates stayed in the company that trained them after the training had completed. Smaller companies therefore had greater problems not only in attracting new employees and skilled workers, but also in retaining skilled workers and continuing to employ newly trained skilled staff. In addition, smaller firms offer further professional development less frequently than larger firms. Nevertheless, the proportion of employees with further professional development is at a similar level. Innovation and investment activities are also very dependent on the size of the establishments on the one hand and R&D activities on the other. Larger establishments and companies with R&D activities make innovations more frequently than smaller establishments or establishments without R&D activities. In addition, larger establishments invest more frequently than smaller operations. Considering investments per employee in the investing establishments, however, there are no differences between the individual size categories. ln smaller establishments the need for external capital is greater than in larger establishments." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://doku.iab.de/forschungsbericht/2011/fb0711.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany] in its series IAB-Forschungsbericht with number 201107.

    as in new window
    Length: 110 pages
    Date of creation: 20 Sep 2011
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:iab:iabfob:201107

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: Regensburger Str. 104, D-90327 Nürnberg
    Phone: 0911/179-0
    Fax: 0911/179-3258
    Email:
    Web page: http://www.iab.de/
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords: Kleinbetrieb; IAB-Betriebspanel; Kleinstunternehmen; Betriebsgröße; Arbeitszeitgestaltung; Ausbildungsbetrieb; befristeter Arbeitsvertrag; Produktivität; Einkommen; Export; Beschäftigungsentwicklung; Leiharbeit; befristeter Arbeitsvertrag; Beschäftigungsform; Personaleinstellung; Fachkräftebedarf;

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    References

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
    as in new window
    1. Joachim Ragnitz & Siegfried Beer, 1997. "Betriebsgröße und Arbeitsproduktivität im ostdeutschen Verarbeitenden Gewerbe," Wirtschaft im Wandel, Halle Institute for Economic Research, vol. 3(16), pages 11-13.
    2. Franz, Wolfgang & Pfeiffer, Friedhelm, 2001. "Tarifbindung und die ökonomische Rationalität von Lohnrigiditäten," ZEW Discussion Papers 01-01, ZEW - Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung / Center for European Economic Research.
    3. Buch, Tanja & Hamann, Silke & Meier, Henning & Niebuhr, Annekatrin & Peters, Cornelius & Puckelwald, Johannes, 2011. "Analyse der Berücksichtigung eines Wanderungsindikators im Rahmen der Abgrenzung des GRW-Fördergebiets : Gutachten für die Gemeinschaftsaufgabe "Verbesserung der regionalen Wirtschaftsstruktur," IAB-Forschungsbericht 201104, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    4. Karl Brenke, 2010. "Fachkräftemangel kurzfristig noch nicht in Sicht," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 77(46), pages 2-15.
    5. Susanne Kohaut & Claus Schnabel, 2003. "Tarifverträge - nein danke!?, Ausmaß und Einflussfaktoren der Tarifbindung west- und ostdeutscher Betriebe," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), Justus-Liebig University Giessen, Department of Statistics and Economics, vol. 223(3), pages 312-331, May.
    6. Silke Anger, 2006. "Zur Vergütung von Überstunden in Deutschland: unbezahlte Mehrarbeit auf dem Vormarsch," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 73(15/16), pages 189-196.
    7. Audretsch, D.B. & van Leeuwen, G. & Menkveld, B. & Thurik, R., 1999. "Are Small Firms Really Sub-Optimal?: Compensating Factor Differentials in Small Dutch Manufacturing Firms," Papers 9902/e, NEUHUYS - RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR SMALL AND MEDIUM.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iab:iabfob:201107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (IAB, Geschäftsbereich Dokumentation und Bibliothek).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.