Simultaneous test procedures in terms of p-value copulae
AbstractAt least since , a broad class of multiple comparison procedures, so-called simultaneous test procedures (STPs), is established in the statistical literature. Elements of an STP are a testing family, consisting of a set of null hypotheses and corresponding test statistics, and a common critical constant. The latter threshold with which each of the test statistics has to be compared is calculated under the (joint) intersection hypothesis of all nulls. Under certain structural assumptions, the so-constructed STP provides strong control of the family-wise error rate. More recently, a general method to construct STPs in the case of asymptotic (joint) normality of the family of test statistics has been developed in , and numerical solutions to compute the critical constant in such cases were provided. Here, we propose to look at the problem from a different perspective. We will show that the threshold can equivalently be expressed by a quantile of the copula of the family of pvalues associated with the test statistics, assuming that each of these p-values is marginally uniformly distributed on the unit interval under the corresponding null hypothesis. This offers the opportunity to exploit the rich and growing literature on copula-based modeling of multivariate dependency structures for multiple testing problems and in particular for the construction of STPs in non-Gaussian situations.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Sonderforschungsbereich 649, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany in its series SFB 649 Discussion Papers with number SFB649DP2012-049.
Length: 6 pages
Date of creation: Aug 2012
Date of revision:
distributional transform; family-wise error rate; multiple hypotheses testing; multiplicity correction; simultaneous statistical inference; single-step test factor structure; prediction;
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- C12 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Hypothesis Testing: General
- C44 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Operations Research; Statistical Decision Theory
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Fengler, Matthias & Okhrin, Ostap, 2012.
Economics Working Paper Series
1214, University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science.
- Schäfer Juliane & Strimmer Korbinian, 2005. "A Shrinkage Approach to Large-Scale Covariance Matrix Estimation and Implications for Functional Genomics," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 4(1), pages 1-32, November.
- Cerqueti, Roy & Costantini, Mauro & Lupi, Claudio, 2012. "A copula-based analysis of false discovery rate control under dependence assumptions," Economics & Statistics Discussion Papers esdp12065, University of Molise, Dept. EGSeI.
- Christian Genest & Michel Gendron & Micha�l Bourdeau-Brien, 2009. "The Advent of Copulas in Finance," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(7-8), pages 609-618.
- Wolfgang Härdle & Ostap Okhrin, 2009. "De copulis non est disputandum - Copulae: An Overview," SFB 649 Discussion Papers SFB649DP2009-031, Sonderforschungsbereich 649, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany.
- Ghosal, Subhashis & Roy, Anindya, 2011. "Predicting False Discovery Proportion Under Dependence," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 106(495), pages 1208-1218.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (RDC-Team).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.