IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hrr/papers/0307.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Effect of Pension Plan Type on Retirement Age: Distinguishing Plan Incentives from Career Length Preferences

Author

Listed:
  • Colleen Flaherty Manchester

Abstract

The widespread movement from defined benefit (DB) plans to defined contribution (DC) plans over the past few decades has transferred much of the retirement savings risk from the institution to the individual, particularly in the private sector. This study uses the Retirement Confidence Survey of College and University Faculty, 2005 to ex- amine the use of DC plans relative to DB plans among faculty and the impact of plan incentives on expected retirement age. This study finds that the difference in retirement wealth accrual patterns between the two types of plans generates an eight-month difference in expected retirement ages for individuals in a DC plan relative to those in a DB plan. Preferences over career length double the effect of incentives: individuals who elect to enroll in a DB plan expect to retire sixteen months earlier than those who chose to enroll in a DC plan. In addition, this paper finds that individuals choose retirement plans to diversity their sources of retirement income, which has implications for proposed policies that incorporate individual accounts into Social Security.

Suggested Citation

  • Colleen Flaherty Manchester, "undated". "The Effect of Pension Plan Type on Retirement Age: Distinguishing Plan Incentives from Career Length Preferences," Working Papers 0307, Human Resources and Labor Studies, University of Minnesota (Twin Cities Campus).
  • Handle: RePEc:hrr:papers:0307
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.legacy-irc.csom.umn.edu/RePEC/hrr/papers/0307.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hrr:papers:0307. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mary Helen Walker (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ircmnus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.