Since Sen's contribution on the impossibility of a Paretian liberal, his formulation of libertarian rights has been under debate. In this paper, we highlight some important strands in this debate, and achieve some conceptual clarification of the different and often incompatible views of individual rights. We demonstrate in terms of a counter-example and general reasoning that Sen's concept can, more often than not, be inconsistent with our intuitive view of rights and fails to capture important categories of rights. An alternative formulation in terms of game form is introduced, and its relative merit vis-a-vis Sen's formulation is discussed.
Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University in its series Discussion Paper Series with number
a238.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Hiromichi Miyake).
Related research
Keywords:
Other versions of this item:
Article
Gaertner, Wulf & Pattanaik, Prasanta K & Suzumura, Kotaro, 1992.
"Individual Rights Revisited,"
Economica,
London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 59(234), pages 161-77, May.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
Maskin, Eric & Sjostrom, Tomas, 2001.
"Implementation Theory,"
Working Papers
5-01-1, Pennsylvania State University, Department of Economics.
[Downloadable!]
Maskin, Eric & Sjostrom, Tomas, 2002.
"Implementation theory,"
Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare,
in: K. J. Arrow & A. K. Sen & K. Suzumura (ed.), Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 5, pages 237-288
Elsevier.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
BLACKORBY, Charles & BOSSERT, Walter & DONALDSON, David, 2002.
"In Defense of Welfarism,"
Cahiers de recherche
2002-02, Universite de Montreal, Departement de sciences economiques.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions:
Blackorby, C. & Bossert, W. & Donaldson, D., 2002.
"In Defense of Welfarism,"
Cahiers de recherche
02-2002, Centre interuniversitaire de recherche en économie quantitative, CIREQ.
[Downloadable!]
Did you know? You can import bibliographic info in various formats into you bibliographic tool, or just into your word processor. See under "publisher info" on each abstract page.