The paper presents an experimental study of truth telling and trust in communication under asymmetric information. In a two-player Communication Game (cf., Gneezy, 2005), an informed “advisor” sends a message to an uninformed “decision maker”, who then has to decide whether to follow the advice. The advisor may gain more by lying in the message. In two treatments, either a cooperative or a competitive context is induced before participants play the Communication Game. Advisors are unaffected by this contextual variation. In contrast, decision makers in the competitive context trust the advice less than in the cooperative context. The data provide evidence that this change in trust is due to different perceptions of the incentive structure. Individual differences in behavior can be related to certain personal characteristics (field of studies, gender, personality test scores). The data are largely in line with Subjective Equilibrium Analysis (Kalai & Lehrer, 1995).
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by The Ratio Institute in its series Ratio Working Papers with number
111.
Length: 45 pages Date of creation: 10 Apr 2007 Date of revision: Handle: RePEc:hhs:ratioi:0111
Contact details of provider: Postal: The Ratio Institute, P.O. Box 5095, SE-102 42 Stockholm, Sweden Phone: 08-587 054 00 Fax: 08-587 054 05 Email: Web page: http://www.ratio.se/ More information through EDIRC
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Niclas Berggren).
Find related papers by JEL classification: D01 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Microeconomic Behavior: Underlying Principles D80 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - General Z13 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Social Norms and Social Capital; Social Networks Economic Anthropology
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Edward L. Glaeser & David I. Laibson & José A. Scheinkman & Christine L. Soutter, 2000.
"Measuring Trust,"
The Quarterly Journal of Economics,
MIT Press, vol. 115(3), pages 811-846, August.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Brandts,Jordi & Riedl,Arno & Winden,Frans,van, 2005.
"Competition and Well-Being,"
Research Memoranda
033, Maastricht : METEOR, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions:
Jordi Brandts & Arno Riedl & Frans van Winden, 2004.
"Competition and Well-Being,"
UFAE and IAE Working Papers
608.04, Unitat de Fonaments de l'Anàlisi Econòmica (UAB) and Institut d'Anàlisi Econòmica (CSIC).
[Downloadable!]
Kalai, Ehud & Lehrer, Ehud, 1993.
"Subjective Games and Equilibria,"
Working Papers
875, California Institute of Technology, Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences.
[Downloadable!]