IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hhs/nlsclt/2013_010.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Allmenningsrett og naturvern i Skjåk kommune

Author

Listed:
  • Reiten, Mari

    (Department of landscape architecture and spatial planning, Norwegian University of Life Sciences)

Abstract

Denne artikkelen tar for seg hvordan det er å være allmenningsberettiget i Skjåk Almenning når det kommer strenge reguleringer fra offentlig hold. Hvordan påvirker verneforskriftene den faktiske bruken? Og hvordan er brukernes holdninger rundt vernet i områdene? Studiens resultater er basert på en undersøkelse blant allmenningsberettigede i Skjåk Almenning og intervjuer med Skjåk Almenning og forvaltningen. Studien har vist at bruken i forhold til de ulike allmenningsrettene ikke blir direkte påvirket av verneforskriftene. Det er ikke veldig store forandringer i bruken før og etter vernet kom. Det er imidlertid tydelig at vernet har en negativ konsekvens når det gjelder oppfatningen blant brukerne. Det oppleves som et stort overtramp, tap av tillit og at de blir umyndiggjort når forvaltningen blir lagt til sentrale myndigheter. De mener selv – og ingen har sagt seg uenige - at områdene i Skjåk Almenning har blitt forvaltet av bygdefolket på en god måte i mer enn 200 år. Men vil dette fortsette inn idet nye forvaltningsregimet?

Suggested Citation

  • Reiten, Mari, 2013. "Allmenningsrett og naturvern i Skjåk kommune," CLTS Working Papers 10/13, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Centre for Land Tenure Studies, revised 10 Oct 2019.
    • Handle: RePEc:hhs:nlsclt:2013_010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nmbu.no/download/file/fid/40188
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Rights of common; Skjåk; conservation; history; crowding out effect;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q20 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - General
    • Q29 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhs:nlsclt:2013_010. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Ephrida Tione (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ioumbno.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.