IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hhs/nhhfms/2017_005.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Tre grupper skatteytere i søkelyset: Har de ulike kjennetegn?

Author

Listed:
  • Andersson, Jonas

    (Dept. of Business and Management Science, Norwegian School of Economics)

  • Lillestøl, Jostein

    (Dept. of Business and Management Science, Norwegian School of Economics)

Abstract

This report analyzes data for three groups of taxpayers in scrutiny of the tax authorities: Taxpayers who, after a tax amnesty, have voluntary come forward with previous unreported taxable income or wealth abroad, taxpayers where there exist automatic abroad control scheme and taxpayers who have been assigned penalty tax. A number of potential key characteristics are selected, and the groups are compared against one another and with a control group of ordinary taxpayers, with the objective to uncover differences between the groups. Three different methods of analysis are used: Simple categorization, correspondence analysis and classification trees. They are of explorative nature and suitable for graphical presentation of results. A comparison of results, and some advantages and disadvantages of the three methods are discussed, in relation to the ambition level: Find the characteristics that separates the groups, or more, establish rules for classification of individuals with unknown membership.

Suggested Citation

  • Andersson, Jonas & Lillestøl, Jostein, 2017. "Tre grupper skatteytere i søkelyset: Har de ulike kjennetegn?," Discussion Papers 2017/5, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:hhs:nhhfms:2017_005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2437101
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Taxpayers; tax amnesty; simple categorization; correspondence analysis; classification trees;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C00 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - General - - - General
    • H20 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhs:nhhfms:2017_005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stein Fossen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dfnhhno.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.