This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Between Autonomy and Control: The role of industrial researchers’ decision-making

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Husted, Kenneth (Department of Management, Politics and Philosophy, Copenhagen Business School)
Abstract

This paper deals with issues related to management of industrial research. The

overall research question is how industrial researchers can be managed to

increase the company’s benefits. The relevance of this question is put into

perspective by two main considerations. On the one hand, it is widely recognized

that individual researchers should possess a high level of autonomy to preserve

the ability of research to renew itself. On the other hand, companies need to

maintain control over that freedom to develop their research activities in a long-term

company perspective.

The paper contributes to a deeper understanding of the management of industrial

research by moving the focus from risk management and portfolio planning

(decision and control based management) to management in situations marked by

high uncertainty and asymmetric distribution of information (management of

self-governing systems). More specifically, the evolutionary perspective on

individual adaptation is used in combination with evolutionary economics to

create an analytical framework for understanding managerial action in industrial

research. This framework, is used to explain how managers can try to increase

the probability that individual research processes create results, which eventually

increase the fit of the company to its environment. It is argued that research

managers can, to a certain extent, influence the complex processes of individual

adaptation by influencing individual decision making through a) setting and

communicating research specific goals and b) creating and maintaining shared

cognitive frames.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.cbs.dk/departments/mpp/diverse/wp1199.pdf
Our checks indicate that this address may not be valid because: 404 Not Found. If this is indeed the case, please notify (Lars Nondal)
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Copenhagen Business School, Department of Management, Politics & Philosophy in its series Working Papers with number 11/1999.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML, plain text, BibTeX, RIS (EndNote), ReDIF
Length: 21 pages
Date of creation: 01 Oct 1999
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:hhb:cbslpf:1999_011

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Department of Management, Politics and Philosophy, Copenhagen Business School, Blaagaardsgade 23 B, DK-2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark
Phone: +45 3815 3815
Email:
Web page: http://www.cbs.dk/departments/mpp/
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Lars Nondal).

Related research
Keywords: Autonomy Control Industrial research Decision-making Research management Managment of industrial research

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
  1. Rosenberg, Nathan, 1990. "Why do firms do basic research (with their own money)?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 165-174, April. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  2. Gambardella, Alfonso & Torrisi, Salvatore, 1998. "Does technological convergence imply convergence in markets? Evidence from the electronics industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(5), pages 445-463, September. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  3. Guice, Jon, 1999. "Designing the future: the culture of new trends in science and technology," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 81-98, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  4. Paula E. Stephan, 1996. "The Economics of Science," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 34(3), pages 1199-1235, September. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  5. Marengo, L, 1992. "Coordination and Organizational Learning in the Firm," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 2(4), pages 313-26, December.
  6. Pavitt, Keith, 1998. "Technologies, Products and Organization in the Innovating Firm: What Adam Smith Tells Us and Joseph Schumpeter Doesn't," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press, vol. 7(3), pages 433-52, September.
  7. Frenken, Koen & Saviotti, Paolo P. & Trommetter, Michel, 1999. "Variety and niche creation in aircraft, helicopters, motorcycles and microcomputers," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(5), pages 469-488, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  8. Rebecca Henderson & Iain Cockburn, 1993. "Scale, Scope and Spillovers: The Determinants of Research Productivity in the Pharmaceutical Industry," NBER Working Papers 4466, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  9. Jens Frøslev Christensen, 1998. "The Dynamics of the Diversified Corporation and the Role of Central Management of Technology," DRUID Working Papers 98-4, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies. [Downloadable!]
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? The most prolific authors have over 400 items listed on IDEAS.

This page was last updated on 2008-7-7.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.