Svenstrup, Mikkel () (Department of Finance, Aarhus School of Business)
Abstract
In this paper we examine the cost of using recalibrated single-factor
models to determine the exercise strategy for Bermudan swaptions in a
multi-factor world. We demonstrate that single-factor exercise strategies
applied in a multi-factor world only give rise to economically insignificant
losses. Furthermore, we find that the conditional model risk as defined
in Longstaff, Santa-Clara & Schwartz (2001), is statistically insignificant
given the number of observations. Additional tests using the Primal-Dual
algorithm of Andersen & Broadie (2001) indicate that losses found in
Longstaff et al. (2001) cannot as claimed be ascribed to the number of
factors. Finally we find that for valuation of Bermudan swaptions with
long exercise periods, the simple approach proposed in Andersen (2000)
is outperformed by the Least Square Monte Carlo method of Longstaff &
Schwartz (2001) and, surprisingly, also by the exercise strategies from the
single-factor models.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by University of Aarhus, Aarhus School of Business, Department of Business Studies in its series Finance Working Papers with number
02-24.
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.: