This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Evaluating the C-CAPM and the Equity Premium Puzzle at Short and Long Horizons: A Markovian Bootstrap Approach

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Engsted, Tom () (Department of Finance, Aarhus School of Business)
Mammen, Enno (Institute für Angewandte Mathematik)
Tanggaard, Carsten () (Department of Finance, Aarhus School of Business)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

We investigate the C-CAPM and the equity premium puzzle using asset returns and consumption data from the US and Denmark. In contrast to previous studies the investigation is carried out with both short and long investment horizons. In addition, we introduce a Markovian bootstrap approach to calculate the finite-sample distributions of the various test statistics used. Among other things, our approach allows testing the hypothesis of no pricing errors based on the Hansen and Jagannathan (1997) specification error measure, which is not possible based on asymptotic approximations. The analysis shows that there are large differences between US and Danish asset markets, and also to some extent differences depending on the length of the investment horizon. In addition, with a long investment horizon, the asymptotic and bootstrap estimated distributions often differ markedly. We also find that althrough the Hansen-Jagannathan specification error measure points to large pricing errors, when we account properly (using the bootstrap approach) for sampling error, there is no evidence against the C-CAPM with CRRA utility in neither the US nor Danish data. However, the bootstrap based tests of a zero-mean risk-adjusted equity premium clearly reject the model on US data.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.hha.dk/fin/finance/RESEARCH/D00_10.PDF
Our checks indicate that this address may not be valid because: 404 Not Found. If this is indeed the case, please notify (Helle Vinbaek Stenholt)
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by University of Aarhus, Aarhus School of Business, Department of Business Studies in its series Finance Working Papers with number 00-10.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 49 pages
Date of creation: 01 Apr 2000
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:hhb:aarfin:2000_010

Contact details of provider:
Postal: The Aarhus School of Business, Fuglesangs Allé 4, DK-8210 Aarhus V, Denmark
Fax: + 45 86 15 19 43
Web page: http://www.asb.dk/about/departments/bs.aspx
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Helle Vinbaek Stenholt).

Related research
Keywords: Hansen-Jagannathan bounds; Heavy-tailed pricing errors; Bootstrap simulations;

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)

  1. Stuart Hyde & Mohamed Sherif, 2004. "Don't break the habit: structural stability tests of consumption models in the UK," Money Macro and Finance (MMF) Research Group Conference 2003 49, Money Macro and Finance Research Group. [Downloadable!]
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? You too can volunteer for RePEc, for example by editing a NEP report.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-25.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.