This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

New Public Management Comes to America

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Laurence E. Lynn, Jr.
Abstract

The United States has had an ambiguous relationship to the New Public Management (NPM) as a global public sector reform movement. Many of the themes, concepts, and tools of governance associated with NPM's managerial ideology-"business-like management," competitive tendering, incentives, agencification, devolution, performance measurement and management, subsidiarity- have long been staples of U.S. federal, state and local public management. Most of the elements of NPM have been road-tested in America. Yet public management reform in the U.S. in the NPM era that was underway in the 1980s has been decidedly heterodox, a manifestation of what Paul Light (1997) has termed the variously-themed "tides of reform" that ebb and flow through American public administration. Beginning in 2001, with the administration of George W. Bush, a new tide of reform has surged in, displacing the Clinton administration's emphasis on "reinventing government." The Bush reforms have attracted surprisingly little attention compared to the swarms of public management experts who examined the Clinton initiatives from their outset. Whereas Lyndon Johnson sought to use systematic analysis to strengthen executive control over policy and budget priorities, Richard Nixon sought to create a centralized "administrative presidency," Jimmy Carter attempted to enhance executive control over the assignment and remuneration of senior civil servants, Ronald Reagan proclaimed a "war on waste" and inefficiency and Bill Clinton promised to "let managers manage" toward a government that "works better and costs less," George W. Bush has undertaken virtually all of these things to at least some degree-and more. Despite their apparent breadth, however, Bush reforms have reflected more of the essential spirit of New Public Management than those of any other recent American president.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://harrisschool.uchicago.edu/about/publications/working-papers/pdf/wp_08_04.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Harris School of Public Policy Studies, University of Chicago in its series Working Papers with number 0804.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: Mar 2008
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:har:wpaper:0804

Contact details of provider:
Postal: 1155 East 60th Street, Chicago, IL 60637
Phone: 773-702-8400
Email:
Web page: http://harrisschool.uchicago.edu/
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Eleanor Cartelli).

Related research
Keywords: public management; Bush Administration reform; governance;

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? About 1000 archives contribute their bibliographic data to RePEc.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-22.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.