Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Mixer quali et quanti pour quoi faire ? Méthodologie sans épistémologie n'est que ruine de réflexion

Contents:

Author Info

  • M. J. Avenier

    (CERAG - Centre d'études et de recherches appliquées à la gestion - CNRS : UMR5820 - Université Pierre Mendès-France - Grenoble II)

  • Catherine Thomas

    ()
    (GREDEG - Groupe de Recherche en Droit, Economie et Gestion - CNRS : UMR6227 - Université de Nice Sophia Antipolis (UNS))

Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    Cette communication vise à aider les chercheurs à élaborer un design de recherche globalement cohérent. Elle met en lumière l'importance fondamentale de situer les réflexions concerant les méthodes de recherche mixtes, tout autant que celle uniquement quantitatives ou uniquement qualitatives, dans un cadre épistémologique explicite. Elle examine le rôle et l'apport potentiel de ces méthodes dans trois des principaux paradigmes épistémologiques contemporains en sciences des organisations : le positivisme, le réalisme critique et le constructivisme pragmatique. Il ressort de l'étude réalisée que la combinaison de méthodes idiographiques et nomothétiques n'est envisageable et potentiellement féconde que dans le paradigme épistémologique positiviste et dans une séquence particulière : étude idiographique pour la génération de connnaissances.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/64/43/03/PDF/CR_2011-06_E4.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by HAL in its series Working Papers with number halshs-00644303.

    as in new window
    Length:
    Date of creation: 12 Dec 2011
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-00644303

    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: http://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00644303
    Contact details of provider:
    Web page: http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/

    Related research

    Keywords: méthodes mixtes; réalisme critique; paradigme épistémologique; constructiviste pragmatique; génération de connaissances ; justification de connaissances;

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-00644303. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (CCSD).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.