ELIE-minating poverty? Limits of the mechanism and potential improvements
AbstractUsing French data, we show that ELIE performs rather weakly when it comes to addressing the issue of poverty. Yet, eliminating poverty is also a valid normative property of any redistribution mechanism. We suggest combining ELIE with another redistributive solution aimed specifically at alleviating poverty: the personal allowance mechanism (Leroux, 2004 and 2007). We argue that ELIE and the personal allowance mechanism, more than being compatible, are in fact complementary.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by HAL in its series Working Papers with number halshs-00348353.
Date of creation: 18 Dec 2008
Date of revision:
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: http://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00348353/en/
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/
poverty; redistribution; social justice;
Other versions of this item:
- Alain Leroux & Justin Leroux, 2009. "ELIE-minating poverty? Limits of the mechanism and potential improvements," Cahiers de recherche 09-02, HEC Montréal, Institut d'économie appliquée.
- NEP-ALL-2009-01-03 (All new papers)
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Michel Lubrano, 2008. "The Redistributive Aspects of ELIE: a simulationapproach," Working Papers halshs-00347278, HAL.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (CCSD).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.