IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/wpaper/hal-00879673.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Facteurs De Risques, Motifs Et Moteurs D'Une Demarche Rse : Une Mise En Evidence De Strategies Rse Sur‐Mesure Pour Conforter La Perennisation De L'Entreprise

Author

Listed:
  • Christophe Lebarbier

    (REEDS - Centre international de Recherches en Economie écologique, Eco-innovation et ingénierie du Développement Soutenable - UVSQ - Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines)

Abstract

Left margin at the advent of modern capitalism of big businesses, the social dimension of the production has gradually found a place alongside the economic dimension, to appear more strongly today as legitimizing productive combinations. This legitimacy is based on respect and a more equitable sharing of risk (social and environmental externalities) on the basis of a socially acceptable production conditions. The concept of sustainable development, in the sense of a reduction target and sharing procedural social and environmental risks, tends to become gradually a new principle of procedural legitimacy of the action, in substitution of previous principles discredited (the market and the state). In this context of pervasive pragmatism over ideology (dogmatic principles), CSR seems to assert itself as a full 3rd way of regulation of capitalism in a movement of complex interactions Enterprise‐Society, polymorphic and more direct in search of a sustainable productive combinations.

Suggested Citation

  • Christophe Lebarbier, 2010. "Facteurs De Risques, Motifs Et Moteurs D'Une Demarche Rse : Une Mise En Evidence De Strategies Rse Sur‐Mesure Pour Conforter La Perennisation De L'Entreprise," Working Papers hal-00879673, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-00879673
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-00879673
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-00879673/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Faucheux, Sylvie & Froger, Geraldine & Noel, Jean-Francois, 1995. "What forms of rationality for sustainable development?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 169-209.
    2. Dimbi Ramonjy, 2005. "Discussions de la co-construction de la légitimité organisationnelle : comment l'entreprise (ré)concilie l'économique et le social dans les relations avec ses parties prenantes ?," Post-Print hal-00156130, HAL.
    3. de Villiers, Charl & van Staden, Chris J., 2006. "Can less environmental disclosure have a legitimising effect? Evidence from Africa," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(8), pages 763-781, November.
    4. Jérôme Ballet & Françoise de Bry & Aurélie Carimentrand & Patrick Jolivet, 2011. "L'entreprise et l'éthique," Post-Print halshs-00771565, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Contreras-Pacheco, Orlando E. & Claasen, Cyrlene, 2017. "Fuzzy reporting as a way for a company to greenwash: perspectives from the Colombian reality," MPRA Paper 85472, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Mădălina Dumitru & Justyna Dyduch & Raluca-Gina Gușe & Joanna Krasodomska, 2017. "Corporate Reporting Practices in Poland and Romania – An Ex-ante Study to the New Non-financial Reporting European Directive," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(3), pages 279-304, September.
    3. Ishmael Tingbani & Lyton Chithambo & Venancio Tauringana & Nikolaos Papanikolaou, 2020. "Board gender diversity, environmental committee and greenhouse gas voluntary disclosures," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2194-2210, September.
    4. Xiao, He, 2022. "Environmental regulation and firm capital structure dynamics," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 770-787.
    5. María Luisa Pajuelo Moreno & Teresa Duarte-Atoche, 2019. "Relationship between Sustainable Disclosure and Performance—An Extension of Ullmann’s Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-33, August.
    6. Moazzem Hossain & Angela Hecimovic & Aklema Choudhury Lema, 2015. "Corporate Social and Environmental Responsibility Reporting Practices from an Emerging Mobile Telecommunications Market," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 25(4), pages 389-404, December.
    7. Tzu-Kuan Chiu & Yi-Hsin Wang, 2015. "Determinants of Social Disclosure Quality in Taiwan: An Application of Stakeholder Theory," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 129(2), pages 379-398, June.
    8. Zanellato Gianluca, 2021. "Quality of Information Disclosed in Integrated Reports, in the Extracting Sector: Insights from Europe," Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Oeconomica, Sciendo, vol. 66(3), pages 1-20, December.
    9. Sophie Giordano-Spring, 2008. "De La Ceremonie Comptable Dans Les Rapports Developpement Durable," Post-Print halshs-00524891, HAL.
    10. Jianhua Yin & Sen Wang, 2018. "The effects of corporate environmental disclosure on environmental innovation from stakeholder perspectives," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(8), pages 905-919, February.
    11. Beck, A. Cornelia & Campbell, David & Shrives, Philip J., 2010. "Content analysis in environmental reporting research: Enrichment and rehearsal of the method in a British–German context," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 207-222.
    12. Dong Ding & Bin Liu & Millicent Chang, 2023. "Carbon Emissions and TCFD Aligned Climate-Related Information Disclosures," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 182(4), pages 967-1001, February.
    13. Karaman, Abdullah S. & Orazalin, Nurlan & Uyar, Ali & Shahbaz, Muhammad, 2021. "CSR achievement, reporting, and assurance in the energy sector: Does economic development matter?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    14. Muhammad Safdar Sial & Chunmei Zheng & Nguyen Vinh Khuong & Tehmina Khan & Muhammad Usman, 2018. "Does Firm Performance Influence Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting of Chinese Listed Companies?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-12, June.
    15. Albertina Paula Monteiro & Francisco Barbosa & Amélia Ferreira da Silva & Catarina Cepêda, 2023. "Industry and performance in the Portuguese listed companies: the mediating role of the environmental information disclosure," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 10(4), pages 372-389, June.
    16. Liana Rahardja & Itjang Gunawan & Yvonne Augustine & Ratna Wardhani, 2021. "The Influence of Environmental Performance towards Creating Shared Value," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 18(1), pages 230-240, April.
    17. Warren Maroun, 2020. "A Conceptual Model for Understanding Corporate Social Responsibility Assurance Practice," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 161(1), pages 187-209, January.
    18. Evangeline Elijido-Ten, 2011. "Media coverage and voluntary environmental disclosures: A developing country exploratory experiment," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(3), pages 139-157, September.
    19. Assunta Di Vaio & Luisa Varriale & Angelo Di Gregorio & Samuel Adomako, 2022. "Corporate social performance and non‐financial reporting in the cruise industry: Paving the way towards UN Agenda 2030," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(6), pages 1931-1953, November.
    20. Uche, Chinyere & Khalid, Sharif, 2022. "Corporate reporting on conflict: A struggle over land," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-00879673. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.