IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/inria-00634387.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A model-free no-arbitrage price bound for variance options

Author

Listed:
  • J. Frederic Bonnans

    (Commands - Control, Optimization, Models, Methods and Applications for Nonlinear Dynamical Systems - CMAP - Centre de Mathématiques Appliquées - Ecole Polytechnique - X - École polytechnique - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - Inria Saclay - Ile de France - Inria - Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique, CMAP - Centre de Mathématiques Appliquées - Ecole Polytechnique - X - École polytechnique - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Xiaolu Tan

    (CMAP - Centre de Mathématiques Appliquées - Ecole Polytechnique - X - École polytechnique - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

In the framework of Galichon, Henry-Labordère and Touzi, we consider the model-free no-arbitrage bound of variance option given the marginal distributions of the underlying asset. We first make some approximations which restrict the computation on a bounded domain. Then we propose a gradient projection algorithm together with a finite difference scheme to approximate the bound. The general convergence result is obtained. We also provide a numerical example on the variance swap option.

Suggested Citation

  • J. Frederic Bonnans & Xiaolu Tan, 2013. "A model-free no-arbitrage price bound for variance options," Post-Print inria-00634387, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:inria-00634387
    DOI: 10.1007/s00245-013-9197-1
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://inria.hal.science/inria-00634387
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://inria.hal.science/inria-00634387/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00245-013-9197-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Carr & Roger Lee, 2010. "Hedging variance options on continuous semimartingales," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 179-207, April.
    2. David G. Hobson, 1998. "Robust hedging of the lookback option," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 2(4), pages 329-347.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sergey Badikov & Mark H.A. Davis & Antoine Jacquier, 2021. "Perturbation analysis of sub/super hedging problems," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1240-1274, October.
    2. Henry-Labordère, Pierre & Tan, Xiaolu & Touzi, Nizar, 2016. "An explicit martingale version of the one-dimensional Brenier’s Theorem with full marginals constraint," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 126(9), pages 2800-2834.
    3. Nabil Kahalé, 2017. "Superreplication of Financial Derivatives via Convex Programming," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(7), pages 2323-2339, July.
    4. Erhan Bayraktar & Christopher W. Miller, 2019. "Distribution‐constrained optimal stopping," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 368-406, January.
    5. Sebastian Herrmann & Florian Stebegg, 2017. "Robust Pricing and Hedging around the Globe," Papers 1707.08545, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2019.
    6. Sergey Badikov & Mark H. A. Davis & Antoine Jacquier, 2018. "Perturbation analysis of sub/super hedging problems," Papers 1806.03543, arXiv.org, revised May 2021.
    7. Christopher W. Miller, 2016. "A Duality Result for Robust Optimization with Expectation Constraints," Papers 1610.01227, arXiv.org.
    8. Gaoyue Guo & Jan Obloj, 2017. "Computational Methods for Martingale Optimal Transport problems," Papers 1710.07911, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2019.
    9. Gaoyue Guo & Xiaolu Tan & Nizar Touzi, 2015. "Optimal Skorokhod embedding under finitely-many marginal constraints," Papers 1506.04063, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2016.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Hobson & Anthony Neuberger, 2016. "On the value of being American," Papers 1604.02269, arXiv.org.
    2. David Hobson & Dominykas Norgilas, 2019. "Robust bounds for the American put," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 359-395, April.
    3. Florian Stebegg, 2014. "Model-Independent Pricing of Asian Options via Optimal Martingale Transport," Papers 1412.1429, arXiv.org.
    4. Alexander M. G. Cox & Jiajie Wang, 2013. "Optimal robust bounds for variance options," Papers 1308.4363, arXiv.org.
    5. Yan Dolinsky & H. Mete Soner, 2013. "Robust Hedging with Proportional Transaction Costs," Papers 1302.0590, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2013.
    6. Mathias Beiglböck & Pierre Henry-Labordère & Friedrich Penkner, 2013. "Model-independent bounds for option prices—a mass transport approach," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 477-501, July.
    7. Erhan Bayraktar & Thomas Bernhardt, 2020. "On the Continuity of the Root Barrier," Papers 2010.14695, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2021.
    8. David Hobson & Dominykas Norgilas, 2017. "Robust bounds for the American Put," Papers 1711.06466, arXiv.org, revised May 2018.
    9. Alexander M. G. Cox & Annemarie M. Grass, 2023. "Robust option pricing with volatility term structure -- An empirical study for variance options," Papers 2312.09201, arXiv.org.
    10. Yan Dolinsky & H. Soner, 2014. "Robust hedging with proportional transaction costs," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 327-347, April.
    11. Huy N. Chau & Masaaki Fukasawa & Miklos Rasonyi, 2021. "Super-replication with transaction costs under model uncertainty for continuous processes," Papers 2102.02298, arXiv.org.
    12. Y. Dolinsky & H. M. Soner, 2014. "Martingale optimal transport in the Skorokhod space," Papers 1404.1516, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2015.
    13. David Hobson & Anthony Neuberger, 2017. "Model uncertainty and the pricing of American options," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 285-329, January.
    14. Sebastian Herrmann & Johannes Muhle-Karbe, 2017. "Model uncertainty, recalibration, and the emergence of delta–vega hedging," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 873-930, October.
    15. Huy N. Chau & Masaaki Fukasawa & Miklós Rásonyi, 2022. "Super‐replication with transaction costs under model uncertainty for continuous processes," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(4), pages 1066-1085, October.
    16. Sebastian Herrmann & Johannes Muhle-Karbe, 2017. "Model Uncertainty, Recalibration, and the Emergence of Delta-Vega Hedging," Papers 1704.04524, arXiv.org.
    17. Dolinsky, Yan & Soner, H. Mete, 2015. "Martingale optimal transport in the Skorokhod space," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 125(10), pages 3893-3931.
    18. Hansjörg Albrecher & Philipp Mayer, 2010. "Semi-Static Hedging Strategies For Exotic Options," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Rüdiger Kiesel & Matthias Scherer & Rudi Zagst (ed.), Alternative Investments And Strategies, chapter 14, pages 345-373, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    19. Libor Pospisil & Jan Vecer, 2010. "Portfolio sensitivity to changes in the maximum and the maximum drawdown," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(6), pages 617-627.
    20. Alexander M. G. Cox & Christoph Hoeggerl, 2013. "Model-independent no-arbitrage conditions on American put options," Papers 1301.5467, arXiv.org.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:inria-00634387. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.