This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

L'influence des facteurs macroéconomiques sur les ouvertures d'enquêtes antidumping : Le cas de l'Union européenne et des États-Unis

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Mustapha Sadni Jallab () (UNECA - United Nations Economic Commission for Africa - United Nations)
Monnet Gbakou () (GATE - Groupe d'analyse et de théorie économique - CNRS : UMR5824 - Université Lumière - Lyon II - Ecole Normale Supérieure Lettres et Sciences Humaines)
René Sandretto () (GATE - Groupe d'analyse et de théorie économique - CNRS : UMR5824 - Université Lumière - Lyon II - Ecole Normale Supérieure Lettres et Sciences Humaines)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

L'objectif de cet article est d'élargir certains récents travaux qui analysent économétriquement l'influence de quelques variables macroéconomiques sur le nombre des ouvertures d'action antidumping aux États-Unis et au sein de l'Union européenne (Knetter et Prusa, 2003 ; Feinberg, 2005). Les résultats de nos estimations confirment que le taux de change réel exerce une influence similaire pour les deux régions. Les fluctuations du PIB influencent l'ouverture d'enquête antidumping seulement aux États-Unis. A contrario, l'évolution de la production industrielle ne joue pas un rôle significatif pour les États-Unis alors que cet effet est important pour l'Union européenne. Le renforcement de la concurrence internationale apparaît agir de manière significative dans l'accroissement des enquêtes aux États-Unis alors que celui-ci ne semble pas agir de la même manière pour l'Union européenne. Somme toute, une des principales différences entre les États-Unis et l'UE semble être expliquée par les différences de règles et de pratiques mises en place par les autorités de régulations respectives.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/37/17/69/PDF/TEXTE_2-1-1.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by HAL in its series Post-Print with number halshs-00371769_v1.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: 2008
Date of revision:
Publication status: Published, Revue d'Economie Politique, 2008, 118, 4, pp. 573-600
Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00371769_v1

Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: http://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00371769/en/
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (CCSD).

Related research
Keywords: Taux de change Dollar Euro; Enquêtes Antidumping; Modèle Binomial Négatif;

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

  1. Danny Leipziger & Hyun Shin, 1991. "The demand for protection: A look at antidumping cases," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 27-38, February. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  2. Krupp, Corinne, 1994. "Antidumping Cases in the U.S. Chemical Industry: A Panel Data Approach," Journal of Industrial Economics, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 42(3), pages 299-311, September. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  3. Prusa, Thomas J., 1992. "Why are so many antidumping petitions withdrawn?," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1-2), pages 1-20, August. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  4. Cameron, A Colin & Trivedi, Pravin K, 1986. "Econometric Models Based on Count Data: Comparisons and Applications of Some Estimators and Tests," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 1(1), pages 29-53, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  5. Robert W. Staiger & Frank A. Wolak, 1996. "Differences in the Uses and Effects of Antidumping Law across Import Sources," NBER Chapters, in: The Political Economy of American Trade Policy, pages 385-422 National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  6. Robert M. Feinberg & Kara M. Reynolds, 2006. "Friendly Fire? The Impact of US Antidumping Enforcement on US Exporters," Working Papers 2006-04, American University, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? About five million pdf files are downloaded through RePEc every year.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-19.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.