Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Combining efficiency with equity : a pragmatic approach

Contents:

Author Info

  • Odile Blanchard

    ()
    (LEPII - Laboratoire d'Economie de la Production et de l'Intégration Internationale - CNRS : FRE2664 - Université Pierre-Mendès-France - Grenoble II)

  • Patrick Criqui

    (LEPII - Laboratoire d'Economie de la Production et de l'Intégration Internationale - CNRS : FRE2664 - Université Pierre-Mendès-France - Grenoble II)

  • Alban Kitous

    (Enerdata S.A. - Aucune)

  • Laurent Viguier

    (CUI - Centre Universitaire d'Informatique - University of Geneva)

Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    What is at stake in the climate negotiations is the provision of a global public good, indeed a "clean" atmosphere.The Kyoto Protocol is only a very minor step toward this objective. Looking further ahead in time, beyond the 2008-2012 period, Annex I Parties' commitments will not be sufficient to achieve the goal of a "clean atmosphere". The question is then how to define a second commitment period agreement with a view to contribute to the ultimate provision of a "clean atmosphere"?The central issue is that of equity, in a context of conflict of interests, where all the countries do not contribute to GHG emissions for the same amount and do not share the same interest in climate mitigation efforts. In addition, in a world of scarce resources, it is clear that most countries will try to achieve any emissions limitation objective at the lowest possible cost.Our paper addresses the two inter-related issues of equity and cost-efficiency: we examine the conditions in which the developing countries could contribute to the effort of reducing global GHG emissions, on the basis of quantified emissions objectives, in addition to the mitigation actions taken by the industrialized countries. The underlying question is: how to allocate GHG emissions allowances to all the countries of the world in an equitable and efficient way ?

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/19/95/69/PDF/OB_PV_AK_LV_PNUD_02.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by HAL in its series Post-Print with number halshs-00199569.

    as in new window
    Length:
    Date of creation: 2003
    Date of revision:
    Publication status: Published, Providing Public Goods : Managing Globalization, Oxford University Press (Ed.), 2003, 280-303
    Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00199569

    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: http://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00199569
    Contact details of provider:
    Web page: http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/

    Related research

    Keywords: CLIMATE CHANGE ; NEGOTIATION ; KYOTO PROTOCOL ; EQUITY ; COST-EFFICIENCY;

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as in new window

    Cited by:
    1. Kawase, Reina & Matsuoka, Yuzuru, 2013. "Reduction targets under three burden-sharing schemes for 50% global GHG reduction toward 2050," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1126-1138.
    2. Patrick Criqui & Denise Cavard, 2004. "Economic approach to climate policies and stakes of international negotiations," Post-Print halshs-00003793, HAL.
    3. repec:hal:ciredw:halshs-00000965 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Bernard, A. & Haurie, A. & Vielle, M. & Viguier, L., 2008. "A two-level dynamic game of carbon emission trading between Russia, China, and Annex B countries," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 1830-1856, June.
    5. Münnich Vass, Miriam & Elofsson, Katarina & Gren, Ing-Marie, 2013. "An equity assessment of introducing uncertain forest carbon sequestration in EU climate policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 1432-1442.

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00199569. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (CCSD).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.