IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-00958659.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Les leaders d'opinion sur les réseaux socionumériques

Author

Listed:
  • Camille Alloing

    (CEREGE [Poitiers] - Centre de recherche en gestion [EA 1722] - IAE Poitiers - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Poitiers - UP - Université de Poitiers = University of Poitiers - UP - Université de Poitiers = University of Poitiers - ULR - La Rochelle Université)

  • Marie Haikel-Elsabeh

    (CEROS - Centre d'Etudes et de Recherches sur les Organisations et la Stratégie - UPN - Université Paris Nanterre)

Abstract

L'une des problématiques des entreprises investissant dans les campagnes marketing sur les réseaux sociaux numériques est de déterminer une population cible qui a une capacité de diffusion et de médiatisation identifiable. Le concept de leader d'opinion semble de prime abord répondre aux caractéristiques souhaitées par les entreprises pour des actions marketing sur Internet. Seulement, les leaders d'opinions sont-ils les seuls usagers d'Internet à pouvoir influer sur les cibles de l'entreprise ? Et comment les identifier et mesurer l'impact de leurs actions, en termes informationnels notamment, considérant que ces leaders sont un construit de l'entreprise à la recherche de leviers de diffusion ? L'objet de cette communication est de présenter l'évolution du concept de leader d'opinion à travers le prisme du web, et de proposer des indicateurs adaptés d'identification et de mesure des actions de ceux-ci en fonction des objectifs poursuivis par les entreprises.

Suggested Citation

  • Camille Alloing & Marie Haikel-Elsabeh, 2012. "Les leaders d'opinion sur les réseaux socionumériques," Post-Print hal-00958659, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00958659
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-00958659
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-00958659/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nino Boccara, 2008. "Models Of Opinion Formation: Influence Of Opinion Leaders," International Journal of Modern Physics C (IJMPC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(01), pages 93-109.
    2. David Godes & Dina Mayzlin, 2004. "Using Online Conversations to Study Word-of-Mouth Communication," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 545-560, June.
    3. Dellarocas, Chrysanthos, 2003. "The Digitization of Word-of-mouth: Promise and Challenges of Online Feedback Mechanisms," Working papers 4296-03, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    4. Chrysanthos Dellarocas, 2003. "The Digitization of Word of Mouth: Promise and Challenges of Online Feedback Mechanisms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(10), pages 1407-1424, October.
    5. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/apm4f17l094k9b53rf0ufca8q is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yucheng Zhang & Zhiling Wang & Lin Xiao & Lijun Wang & Pei Huang, 2023. "Discovering the evolution of online reviews: A bibliometric review," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-22, December.
    2. Khim-Yong Goh & Cheng-Suang Heng & Zhijie Lin, 2013. "Social Media Brand Community and Consumer Behavior: Quantifying the Relative Impact of User- and Marketer-Generated Content," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 88-107, March.
    3. Yabing Jiang & Hong Guo, 2012. "Design of Consumer Review Systems and Product Pricing," Working Papers 12-10, NET Institute.
    4. Dominik Gutt & Jürgen Neumann & Steffen Zimmermann & Dennis Kundisch & Jianqing Chen, 2018. "Design of Review Systems - A Strategic Instrument to shape Online Review Behavior and Economic Outcomes," Working Papers Dissertations 42, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
    5. Pauwels, Koen & Aksehirli, Zeynep & Lackman, Andrew, 2016. "Like the ad or the brand? Marketing stimulates different electronic word-of-mouth content to drive online and offline performance," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 639-655.
    6. Christian Fieseler & Matthes Fleck & Miriam Meckel, 2010. "Corporate Social Responsibility in the Blogosphere," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 91(4), pages 599-614, February.
    7. Pan, Lee-Yun & Chiou, Jyh-Shen, 2011. "How Much Can You Trust Online Information? Cues for Perceived Trustworthiness of Consumer-generated Online Information," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 67-74.
    8. Williams, Martin & Buttle, Francis, 2011. "The Eight Pillars of WOM management: Lessons from a multiple case study," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 85-92.
    9. Jehoshua Eliashberg & Anita Elberse & Mark A.A.M. Leenders, 2006. "The Motion Picture Industry: Critical Issues in Practice, Current Research, and New Research Directions," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(6), pages 638-661, 11-12.
    10. Ahmet Bayraktar & Emine Erdogan, 2015. "What Makes Offline Word-Of-Mouth More Influential Than Online Word-Of-Mouth?," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 9(2), pages 95-107.
    11. Hyunwoo Hwangbo & Jonghyuk Kim, 2019. "A Text Mining Approach for Sustainable Performance in the Film Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-16, June.
    12. Hossin Md Altab & Mu Yinping & Hosain Md Sajjad & Adasa Nkrumah Kofi Frimpong & Michelle Frempomaa Frempong & Stephen Sarfo Adu-Yeboah, 2022. "Understanding Online Consumer Textual Reviews and Rating: Review Length With Moderated Multiple Regression Analysis Approach," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, June.
    13. Supratim Kundu & Swapnajit Chakraborti, 2022. "A comparative study of online consumer reviews of Apple iPhone across Amazon, Twitter and MouthShut platforms," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 925-950, September.
    14. Yubo Chen & Jinhong Xie, 2008. "Online Consumer Review: Word-of-Mouth as a New Element of Marketing Communication Mix," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(3), pages 477-491, March.
    15. Koji Ishida & Lisa Slevitch & Katia Siamionava, 2016. "The Effects of Traditional and Electronic Word-of-Mouth on Destination Image: A Case of Vacation Tourists Visiting Branson, Missouri," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-17, September.
    16. Marchand, André & Hennig-Thurau, Thorsten & Wiertz, Caroline, 2017. "Not all digital word of mouth is created equal: Understanding the respective impact of consumer reviews and microblogs on new product success," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 336-354.
    17. Babutsidze, Zakaria, 2018. "The rise of electronic social networks and implications for advertisers," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 27-39.
    18. Floyd, Kristopher & Freling, Ryan & Alhoqail, Saad & Cho, Hyun Young & Freling, Traci, 2014. "How Online Product Reviews Affect Retail Sales: A Meta-analysis," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 217-232.
    19. Yogesh V. Joshi & Andres Musalem, 2021. "When Consumers Learn, Money Burns: Signaling Quality via Advertising with Observational Learning and Word of Mouth," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(1), pages 168-188, January.
    20. Pyle, Martin A. & Smith, Andrew N. & Chevtchouk, Yanina, 2021. "In eWOM we trust: Using naïve theories to understand consumer trust in a complex eWOM marketspace," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 145-158.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00958659. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.