IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-00691074.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Une loi suffit-elle ? Le mouvement des comptables roumains dans les années 1920

Author

Listed:
  • Dragos Zelinschi

    (LEMNA - Laboratoire d'économie et de management de Nantes Atlantique - IEMN-IAE Nantes - Institut d'Économie et de Management de Nantes - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises - Nantes - UN - Université de Nantes)

Abstract

In Romania, the professionalization of accountancy, carried out by an elite formed by the schools of commerce alumni, leads to the adoption of one of the most favorable accounting laws in Europe in 1921. Thereafter, in the 1920s, in spite of a legally enforced monopoly, the elite of the professionals, organized as the Body of accountants, must continue its movement, because it is confronted with many difficulties: integration of certain categories of experts, definition of the field of expertise, competition with non-members etc. Its strategy evolves, especially due to the status change of accountancy, which becomes a genuine organized and recognized profession.

Suggested Citation

  • Dragos Zelinschi, 2012. "Une loi suffit-elle ? Le mouvement des comptables roumains dans les années 1920," Post-Print hal-00691074, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00691074
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-00691074
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-00691074/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Walker, Stephen P., 1995. "The genesis of professional organization in scotland: a contextual analysis," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 285-310, May.
    2. Willmott, Hugh, 1986. "Organising the profession: A theoretical and historical examination of the development of the major accountancy bodies in the U.K," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 11(6), pages 555-580, October.
    3. Yannick Lemarchand & Marc Nikitin & Henri Zimnovitch, 2008. "International congresses of accountants in the twentieth century: a French perspective," Accounting History Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 97-120.
    4. Walker, Stephen P., 2004. "The genesis of professional organisation in English accountancy," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 127-156, February.
    5. R. J. Briston & M. J. M. Kedslie, 1997. "The internationalization of British professional accounting: the role of the examination exporting bodies," Accounting History Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 175-194.
    6. Sikka, Prem & Willmott, Hugh, 1995. "The power of "independence": defending and extending the jurisdiction of accounting in the United Kingdom," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 20(6), pages 547-581, August.
    7. Walker, Stephen P., 2000. "Benign sacerdotalist or pious assailant. The rise of the professional accountant in British management," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 313-323, April.
    8. Peter Walton, 1993. "Company law and accounting in nineteenth-century Europe," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(2), pages 286-291.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Napier, Christopher J., 2006. "Accounts of change: 30 years of historical accounting research," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(4-5), pages 445-507.
    2. Stephen Walker, 2004. "Conflict, collaboration, fuzzy jurisdictions and partial settlements. Accountants, lawyers and insolvency practice during the late 19th century," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(3), pages 247-265.
    3. Joyce, Yvonne, 2014. "Knowledge mandates in the state–profession dynamic: A study of the British insolvency profession," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 39(8), pages 590-614.
    4. Edwards, John Richard & Anderson, Malcolm & Chandler, Roy A., 2007. "Claiming a jurisdiction for the "Public Accountant" in England prior to organisational fusion," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 32(1-2), pages 61-100.
    5. Edwards, John Richard & Walker, Stephen P., 2010. "Lifestyle, status and occupational differentiation in Victorian accountancy," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 2-22, January.
    6. O'Regan, Philip & Killian, Sheila, 2021. "Beyond professional closure: Uncovering the hidden history of plain accountants," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    7. Cooper, David J. & Robson, Keith, 2006. "Accounting, professions and regulation: Locating the sites of professionalization," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(4-5), pages 415-444.
    8. Caramanis, Constantinos V., 2002. "The interplay between professional groups, the state and supranational agents: Pax Americana in the age of 'globalisation'," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 27(4-5), pages 379-408.
    9. Yee, Helen, 2009. "The re-emergence of the public accounting profession in China: A hegemonic analysis," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 71-92.
    10. Chua, W. F. & Poullaos, C., 1998. "The dynamics of "closure" amidst the construction of market, profession, empire and nationhood: An historical analysis of an Australian accounting association, 1886-1903," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 155-187, February.
    11. Ramirez, Carlos, 2009. "Constructing the governable small practitioner: The changing nature of professional bodies and the management of professional accountants' identities in the UK," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(3-4), pages 381-408, April.
    12. Annisette, Marcia, 2017. "Discourse of the professions: The making, normalizing and taming of Ontario's “foreign-trained accountant”," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 37-61.
    13. Bertrand Malsch & Yves Gendron, 2013. "Re-Theorizing Change: Institutional Experimentation and the Struggle for Domination in the Field of Public Accounting," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(5), pages 870-899, July.
    14. Çakmaklı, Anıl Divarcı & Boone, Christophe & van Witteloostuijn, Arjen, 2020. "Identity realization, multiple logics and legitimacy: Organizational foundings during the emergence of the Dutch accounting industry," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    15. Noguchi, Masayoshi & Edwards, John Richard, 2008. "Harmonising intergroup relations within a professional body: The case of the ICAEW," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 123-147.
    16. Power, Michael K., 2003. "Auditing and the production of legitimacy," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 379-394, May.
    17. Stephen Walker, 1999. "Introduction," Accounting History Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 1-6.
    18. Hamilton, Gavin & Ó hÓgartaigh, Ciarán, 2009. "The Third Policeman: ‘The true and fair view’, language and the habitus of accounting," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 20(8), pages 910-920.
    19. Azubuike O. Oraka, 2015. "Changes in Global Financial Regulatory Framework: Implications for Accountancy Profession in Nigeria," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 5(4), pages 174-197, April.
    20. Chris Poullaos, 2009. "Profession, race and empire: keeping the centre pure, 1921‐1927," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 22(3), pages 429-468, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    professionnalisation; clôture sociale; Roumanie; professionalization; social closure; Romania;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00691074. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.