eGovernment: Does IT save time?
AbstractThe goal of this paper is to define a methodological approach to investigate the following issues. - Do eGovernment tools and applications save time? - Do they support the provision of better services? What are these new and betters services (if any)? What purpose do they serve? What is their added value? - What is the perception of citizens: do they realize or not that services are better and quicker? Do they respond to actual needs? We will not try to answer all these questions and will focus on (i) modelling services; (ii) measuring the time gained; (iii) and measuring the perceptions of citizens. This framework is still in preliminary stages and has not yet been validated in practice.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by HAL in its series Post-Print with number hal-00599187.
Date of creation: 08 Sep 2010
Date of revision:
Publication status: Published - Presented, 32nd EGPA Annual Conference, 2010, Toulouse, France
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00599187/en/
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/
eGovernment; conceptual framework; usability; perceived usefulness;
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-2011-07-02 (All new papers)
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- James E. Bailey & Sammy W. Pearson, 1983. "Development of a Tool for Measuring and Analyzing Computer User Satisfaction," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(5), pages 530-545, May.
- Michael A. DeDonno & Heath A. Demaree, 2008. "Perceived time pressure and the Iowa Gambling Task," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 3(8), pages 636-640, December.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (CCSD).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.